Diagnostic model for distinguishing fresh or old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on modified computed tomography window: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 40397145
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08923-9
Diagnostic model for distinguishing fresh or old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on modified computed tomography window: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a Computed Tomography (CT) -based nomogram for distinguishing fresh from old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs), with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the reference standard.
Methods: In this retrospective study, OVCF patients from The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (August 2022-December 2023) were analyzed. Modified CT window parameters (width: 400; level: 200) were applied to quantify vertebral features, including CT values, height reduction, endplate integrity, trabecular sparsity, Schmorl's nodes, and high-density shadows. Predictive variables were selected via univariate and multivariate logistic regression, followed by nomogram construction. Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (area under the curve, AUC), calibration plots, Hosmer-Lemeshow testing, and decision curve analysis (DCA). 10-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate the generalization performance of the model.
Results: The nomogram incorporated seven imaging biomarkers, achieving AUCs of 0.941 (training cohort) and 0.974 (validation cohort). The calibration accuracy was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (χ²=3.30, P = 0.95). DCA demonstrating significant clinical utility across probability thresholds. In cross-validation, the mean AUC on the validation sets was 0.911 ± 0.080 (mean ± standard deviation).
Conclusion: The proposed CT-based nomogram achieved adequate performance in identifying fresh and old OVCFs.
Keywords: Acute lower back pain; CT value; Diagnostic model; Modified CT window technique; Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval from the institutional review board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University was obtained (K2023-131) and all patients signed informed consent forms. This study was conducted in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.Our study has passed the review of the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, with the registration number ChiCTR2400083010. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
[A nomogram for predicting residual back pain after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures].Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Jun 25;37(6):5535-9. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230652. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024. PMID: 38910376 Chinese.
-
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the probability of new vertebral compression fractures after vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 16;22(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04845-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34784910 Free PMC article.
-
Paraspinal muscle parameters' predictive value for new vertebral compression fractures post-vertebral augmentation: Nomogram development and validation.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 15;11:1379078. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1379078. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38813387 Free PMC article.
-
A nomogram for predicting residual low back pain after percutaneous kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Osteoporos Int. 2023 Apr;34(4):749-762. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06681-2. Epub 2023 Feb 4. Osteoporos Int. 2023. PMID: 36738335
-
Establishment and validation of a nomogram and web calculator for the risk of new vertebral compression fractures and cement leakage after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Eur Spine J. 2022 May;31(5):1108-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07064-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Eur Spine J. 2022. PMID: 34822018 Review.
References
-
- Son HJ, Park SJ, Kim JK, Park JS (2023) Mortality risk after the first occurrence of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the general population: A nationwide cohort study. PLoS ONE 18(9):e0291561. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291561 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Alsoof D, Anderson G, McDonald CL, Basques B, Kuris E, Daniels AH (2022) Diagnosis and management of vertebral compression fracture. Am J Med 135(7):815–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.02.035 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ge C, Chen Z, Cao P (2023) Efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty on vertebral compression fractures with different bone mineral densities: a retrospective study. Bmc Musculoskelet Di 24(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06341-w - DOI
-
- Zhang Y, Qi H, Zhang Y, Wang J, Xue J (2021) Vertebral bone marrow edema in magnetic resonance imaging correlates with bone healing histomorphometry in (sub)acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Eur Spine J 30(9):2708–2717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06814-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Liu B, Tan C, Yang H, Meng B (2016) The application of SPECT in the diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Intensive Crit Care 2(3). https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-8505.100051
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources