Effectiveness of the Better Operative Software Outcomes Tool for Monitoring Cataract Surgery Outcomes in Inhambane Province, Mozambique: Prospective Pilot Diagnostic Accuracy Study
- PMID: 40397505
- PMCID: PMC12138292
- DOI: 10.2196/64500
Effectiveness of the Better Operative Software Outcomes Tool for Monitoring Cataract Surgery Outcomes in Inhambane Province, Mozambique: Prospective Pilot Diagnostic Accuracy Study
Abstract
Background: Cataract is the world's leading cause of avoidable blindness. High-quality cataract surgery is a cost-effective procedure to restore vision. In low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), there are high rates of poor outcomes after surgery and inadequate follow-up, which makes it difficult to effectively monitor surgical outcomes. To address this issue, the Better Operative Outcomes Software Tool (BOOST Cataract app) assesses the final outcome on the first postoperative day and records the reasons for poor outcomes at 6 weeks postoperatively, offering specific advice to improve outcomes.
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the real-world utility of the BOOST Cataract app for monitoring cataract surgical outcomes in Inhambane Province (Mozambique) and to analyze the data collected by the app during a surgical campaign conducted therein.
Methods: This prospective study of diagnostic accuracy included patients older than 50 years who underwent manual small-incision cataract surgery. The BOOST Cataract app was used to collect data on visual acuity (VA) on the first postoperative day and to assess surgical outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity (with their 95% CIs) and area under the curve of the BOOST Cataract app (index test) were calculated to identify suboptimal outcomes (moderate and poor) compared with outcomes 6 weeks after surgery (reference standard). The causes of poor outcomes after 6 weeks were recorded and evaluated using the app.
Results: A total of 141 patients who underwent surgery during a cataract campaign in Inhambane Province (Mozambique) between April 2022 and May 2022 were included in the study. The mean age was 70 (SD 10.2) years, and 48.2% (68/141) of the participants were women. Of the 141 patients, 8 (5.7%) did not complete the study. The BOOST Cataract app had a sensitivity of 94.44% and a specificity of 59% for detecting suboptimal outcomes. The area under the curve was 0.825. The campaign outcomes were as follows: good (VA ≥6/18) in 45.9% (61/133) of cases, moderate (VA <6/18 to ≥6/60) in 33.8% (45/133), and poor (VA<6/60) in 20.3% (27/133) of cases. The main cause of a poor outcome was surgical complication, while refractive error was the main cause of a moderate outcome.
Conclusions: The BOOST Cataract app is a valuable tool for assessing suboptimal cataract surgery outcomes without waiting for the completion of postoperative treatment in settings where postoperative follow-up is incomplete. In resource-limited eye care systems, the BOOST Cataract app provides an opportunity to assess outcomes and analyze results to develop specific strategies to improve quality at a local level.
Keywords: cataract extraction; developing countries; health care; outcome assessment; software; visual acuity.
©Mónica Lecumberri, Dórcia Mandlate, Vasco Cote, Montserrat Martín-Baranera, Carlos L Moser. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 21.05.2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
References
-
- GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144–e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214-109X(20)30489-7 S2214-109X(20)30489-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- McCormick I, Butcher R, Evans JR, Mactaggart IZ, Limburg H, Jolley E, Sapkota YD, Oye JE, Mishra SK, Bastawrous A, Furtado JM, Joshi A, Xiao B, Ravilla TD, Bourne RRA, Cieza A, Keel S, Burton MJ, Ramke J, Ababora JK, AlSawahli H, Alvarado DM, Andriamanjato HH, Ashraf Amalius A, Barrenechea R, Batlle JF, Brea I, Burnett AM, Chiriboga FA, Davaatseren U, Duerksen R, Eusebio CI, Finger RP, Gomez-Bastar PA, Gonzales C, Gurung R, Hajar S, Jadoon MZ, Jain E, Kabona GE, Kalua K, Kandeke L, Kandel RP, Karimurio J, Kulkarni S, Lansingh VC, Lepcha NT, Mathenge W, Mishra SK, Mohammadi SF, Mörchen M, Muhammad N, Musana PB, Mutati GC, Nano ME, Németh J, Paduca A, Páez A, Polack S, Rabiu MM, Rif'ati L, Rodríguez Rodríguez BN, Salowi MA, Sapkota YD, Sargent N, Syumarti M, Thoufeeq U, Villalobos AV, Wachira JW, Wu M, Xiao B, Yee Melgar M, Zhang XJ. Effective cataract surgical coverage in adults aged 50 years and older: estimates from population-based surveys in 55 countries. The Lancet Global Health. 2022 Dec;10(12):e1744–e1753. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(22)00419-3. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Congdon N, Yan X, Lansingh V, Sisay A, Müller A, Chan V, Jin L, Meltzer ME, Karumanchi SM, Guan C, Vuong Q, Rivera N, McCleod-Omawale J, He M. Assessment of cataract surgical outcomes in settings where follow-up is poor: PRECOG, a multicentre observational study. The Lancet Global Health. 2013 Jul;1(1):e37–e45. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(13)70003-2. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous