Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 21;40(3):cyaf021.
doi: 10.1093/her/cyaf021.

Planning, implementation, evaluation, and sustainment of digital health interventions for adolescent substance use prevention: a systematic review of influencing factors based on the RE-AIM framework

Affiliations

Planning, implementation, evaluation, and sustainment of digital health interventions for adolescent substance use prevention: a systematic review of influencing factors based on the RE-AIM framework

Pablo Fernández-León et al. Health Educ Res. .

Abstract

School-based health interventions can help prevent adolescent substance use, but their success depends on various factors affecting planning and evaluation. This study examines the factors that facilitate or hinder the success of school-based digital health interventions. A systematic review was conducted in September-October 2024, following PRISMA guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. From a total of 2530 studies, after removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 51 full-text articles were assessed and 12 met the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using an adapted tool for systematic reviews applying the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. The methodological quality was assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The studies included cluster-randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, and one cross-sectional study, primarily targeting adolescents aged 11.9-17.4 years, with sample sizes ranging from 90 to nearly 5000 participants. Most interventions were implemented in schools in the USA, Europe, and Taiwan, with balanced gender distribution. Many studies reported on reach and effectiveness in reducing substance use, particularly alcohol. However, adoption and implementation factors influencing school participation were less frequently addressed, and maintenance was not mentioned. To maximize impact, future efforts should focus on enhancing sustainment and participation by leveraging emerging technologies for personalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure. 1.
Figure. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mumtaz H, Riaz MH, Wajid H et al. Current challenges and potential solutions to the use of digital health technologies in evidence generation: a narrative review. Front Digit Health 2023;5:1203945. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1203945 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . WHO Guideline: Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020-2025. Geneva: WHO, 2021
    1. World Health Organization . WHO Guideline: Recommendations on Digital Health Interventions for Health System Strengthening. Geneva: WHO, 2019 - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Classification of Digital Health Interventions v1.0. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2018. 1–20. (WHO/RHR/18.06). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RHR-18.06 (19 April 2025, date last accessed).
    1. World Health Organization . WHO Guideline: Youth-centred Digital Health Interventions: A Framework for Planning, Developing and Implementing Solutions with and for Young People. Geneva: WHO, 2020

Publication types