"It really takes a village": perspectives on multi-level barriers to endometrial cancer care for rural patients
- PMID: 40399577
- PMCID: PMC12320979
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09533-3
"It really takes a village": perspectives on multi-level barriers to endometrial cancer care for rural patients
Abstract
Purpose: While it is established that rural cancer patients face multi-level barriers to high-quality treatment, the interconnections between these barriers and how they drive rural cancer disparities is not well-understood. Therefore, our objective was to better understand the interconnections between barriers to high-quality treatment faced by rural endometrial cancer (EC) patients.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 clinicians and healthcare personnel from three large, geographically diverse, rural-serving, integrated healthcare systems in North Carolina. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to examine barriers to high-quality treatment for rural EC patients. Initial codes were derived from a multi-level conceptual framework of rural cancer control, and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: We identified three domains of interconnected barriers. First, travel distance, the most frequently noted barrier, amplified financial barriers and caregiver burden. While gynecologic oncologists could reduce travel burden by referring patients to nearby treatment facilities, provider participants expressed mixed opinions regarding the quality of care received at local facilities. Second, limited health literacy among rural patients often led to challenges in patient-provider communication, including challenges with care-related decision making and comprehension of diagnosis and treatment goals. Finally, supportive care and financial resources were often concentrated at large, urban facilities and not accessible to rural patients. However, even these large facilities lack established systems or standardized processes for supporting the most vulnerable patients.
Conclusion: To achieve equitable access to care and outcomes among EC patients, those living in rural areas may require more targeted, intensive outreach, support, and resources.
Keywords: Access to care; Endometrial cancer; High-quality care; Multi-level barriers; Rural cancer care.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: LPS has received salary support paid to her institution for unrelated work from AstraZeneca. SBW has received salary support paid to her institution for unrelated work from Pfizer Foundation/NCCN and AstraZeneca.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Chronic disease patients' experiences with accessing health care in rural and remote areas: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 1;13(15):1-33. eCollection 2013. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013. PMID: 24228078 Free PMC article.
-
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39054745
-
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336. Health Expect. 2025. PMID: 40600494 Free PMC article.
-
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36194890 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation and analysis of mental health status of the older adult in western rural areas.Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1612600. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612600. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40740371 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weaver SJ, Blake KD, Vanderpool RC, Gardner B, Croyle RT, Srinivasan S. Advancing rural cancer control research: national cancer institute efforts to identify gaps and opportunities. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention [Internet]. 2020. Aug 1 [cited 2024 Jan 29];29(8):1515–8. Available from: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0453 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zahnd WE, Hyon KS, Diaz-Sylvester P, Izadi SR, Colditz GA, Brard L. Rural–urban differences in surgical treatment, regional lymph node examination, and survival in endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Causes Control [Internet]. 2018. Feb 1 [cited 2024 Jan 29];29(2):221. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6311991/ - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bhatia S, Landier W, Paskett ED, Peters KB, Merrill JK, Phillips J, et al. Rural-Urban Disparities in Cancer Outcomes: Opportunities for Future Research. J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]. 2022. Jul 1 [cited 2024 Jan 29];114(7):940–52. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35148389/ - PMC - PubMed
-
- Minig L, Padilla-Iserte P, Zorrero C. The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer. Front Oncol [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2024 Feb 4];5(JAN). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26835417/ - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical