Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 21;24(1):222.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02769-7.

Cardiovascular risk profile in subjects with diabetes: Is SCORE2-Diabetes reliable?

Affiliations

Cardiovascular risk profile in subjects with diabetes: Is SCORE2-Diabetes reliable?

Sabrina Scilletta et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: People living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at a two- to four-fold higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared with those without T2D, making early assessment of their CV risk essential. European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has developed a new model to estimate 10-year CV risk in people with T2D aged ≥ 40 years: SCORE2-Diabetes. Despite its advantages, several aspects remain to be clarified. This study evaluated the association between CV risk stratified by SCORE2-Diabetes and early CV damage assessed through arterial stiffness, intima-media thickness (IMT), and carotid atherosclerosis. Additionally, it examined the agreement between risk stratification by SCORE2 and SCORE2-Diabetes and their concordance with vascular damage.

Methods: Pulse wave velocity (PWV), IMT, and carotid atherosclerosis were assessed in 179 individuals with T2D aged 40-69 years, categorized into SCORE2-Diabetes risk groups: Low (n = 20), Moderate (n = 29), High (n = 44), and very high (n = 37). Patients with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or severe target organ damage (TOD) constituted another group (ASCVD/TOD, n = 49).

Results: PWV was significantly increased from Low to very high and ASCVD/TOD groups (7.2 ± 1.1, 8.7 ± 1.9, 9.8 ± 2.3, 12.8 ± 5.1 and 11.5 ± 3.8 m/s, respectively). Similarly, IMT showed a stepwise increase with risk class (0.68 ± 0.11, 0.78 ± 0.13, 0.83 ± 0.12, 0.86 ± 0.19 and 0.87 ± 0.15 mm, respectively). Patients in very high or ASCVD/TOD group showed a higher prevalence of carotid atherosclerosis than other groups (0%, 17.24%, 11.40%, 37.83% and 40.81%, respectively). No significant differences were found between the very high and ASCVD/TOD groups in any parameter. The correlation between PWV values and increasing CV risk was stronger for SCORE2-Diabetes than for SCORE2. ROC curve analysis showed SCORE2-Diabetes had superior predictive performance for carotid atherosclerosis and high PWV compared to SCORE2 (p = 0.048).

Conclusions: Higher PWV, IMT, and carotid atherosclerosis prevalence were associated with increasing CV risk stratified by SCORE2-Diabetes, with no significant differences between the very high and ASCVD/TOD groups. SCORE2-Diabetes demonstrated a better identification of preclinical vascular damage compared to SCORE2, supporting its use as a reliable tool for identifying vascular damage in T2D patients without ASCVD or TOD.

Keywords: Arterial stiffness; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular risk; Intima-media thickness; SCORE2-Diabetes; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Comitato Etico Catania 2, protocol n. 270/C.E. 26th April 2022. Informed consent was obtained from every participant. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Vascular profile of the study population according to CV risk classes. Box plots showing PWV significantly increased from low to very high and ASCVD/TOD groups. Similar results for IMT, with progressively higher values as the risk classes increase. No statistically significant difference was found in the considered parameters between the very high risk group and ASCVD/TOD group. *P < 0.05 versus low group; #P < 0.05 versus Moderate group; °P < 0.05 versus high group. NS, not significant difference
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PWV distribution in risk classes according to SCORE 2 Diabetes. The boxplot shows the distribution of PWV across different cardiovascular risk classes stratified according to SCORE2 Diabetes. ASCVD/TOD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or severe target organ damage. Spearman’s correlation (R = 0.48, p < 0.05) confirmed a positive association between PWV and increasing risk categories
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of risk stratification between SCORE2 and SCORE2-Diabetes in the study population. ASCVD/TOD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or severe target organ damage. Among the 100 patients initially classified as low or moderate risk by SCORE2, 67 were reclassified as high or very high risk using SCORE2-Diabetes, highlighting a significant reclassification that may impact clinical decision-making
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The boxplot shows the distribution of PWV across different cardiovascular risk classes stratified according to SCORE2. ASCVD/TOD: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or severe target organ damage. Spearman’s correlation (R = 0.28, p < 0.05) confirmed a positive association between PWV and increasing risk categories
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
ROC curves illustrate the performance of SCORE2 and SCORE2 Diabetes in predicting cardiovascular risk according to presence of carotid plaque (atherosclerosis prediction)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
ROC curves illustrate the performance of SCORE2 and SCORE2 Diabetes in predicting cardiovascular risk according to arterial stiffness results (prediction of PWV > 9.25)

References

    1. Timmis A, Vardas P, Townsend N, Torbica A, Katus H, De Smedt D, et al. European society of cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021. Eur Heart J. 2022;43(8):716–99. - PubMed
    1. The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. SCORE2 Working Group and ESC Cardiovascular Risk Collaboration, Hageman S, Pennells L, Ojeda F, Kaptoge S, Kuulasmaa K, et al. SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(25):2439–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. SCORE2-OP working group and ESC Cardiovascular risk collaboration. SCORE2-OP risk prediction algorithms: estimating incident cardiovascular event risk in older persons in four geographical risk regions. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(25):2455–67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G, Coady S, D’Agostino RB, Gibbons R et al. 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation [Internet]. 2014 Jun 24 [cited 2025 Mar 3];129(25_suppl_2). Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.cir.0000437741.48606.98

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources