Central nervous system regions involved in the estrogen-induced afternoon prolactin surge. II. Implantation studies

Abstract

In the intact cycling female rat, there is a surge of plasma PRL during the afternoon of proestrus. Ovariectomy on diestrous day 1 eliminated the PRL surge completely, and injection of 100 micrograms polyestradiol phosphate, a long-acting estrogen, not only maintained the surge, but amplified and prolonged it. Bilateral implantation of an estradiol (E2)-containing cannula [diluted 1:4 with cholesterol (C)] in the medial preoptic area (MPO), but not in the cerebral cortex (CC), also maintained the surge. In long term ovariectomized rats, bilateral implantation of E2-containing cannulae (1:5, 1:10, 1:20, and 1:200) in the corticomedial amygdala (CMA) or ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus or a singular implantation in the third ventricle failed to induce a PRL surge 12 days later. Similar singular implantation in the anterior pituitary (AP) increased the basal levels of plasma PRL compared to those in C-implanted controls, but no surge was evident. Only bilateral implantation of E2 in the MPO induced a small but significant rise of plasma PRL at 1700 and 1900 h. Using higher concentration implants with a higher E2 concentration (1:4) in the MPO and sampling at shorter intervals, significant afternoon PRL surges were induced on days 2-4. However, systemic effects of E2, i.e. vaginal cornification and uterine weight enlargement, were also evident. Similar implants in other brain regions had the same results. Further increasing the E2 to C dilution from 1:10 to 1:200 eliminated the systemic effect of E2 implants, while the PRL surge-inducing ability persisted. It appears that the highest diluted E2 implants (1:150 and 1:200) gave the highest PRL response and persisted for the greatest number of days. Using the highly diluted E2 implants (1:100 and 1:200) in various brain regions, the MPO and the ventromedial hypothalamus were the most sensitive areas in inducing the PRL surge; the other areas studied, including suprachiasmatic nuclei, CMA, AP, and CC were ineffective. In conclusion, highly diluted E2 implants in the brain appear to be effective in obtaining a specific effect on the afternoon PRL surge; the CMA, suprachiasmatic nuclei, AP, and CC are not estrogen feedback sites for the induction of PRL release, and the MPO was the most sensitive area of the estrogen action in the brain regions examined for the induction of the afternoon PRL surge.