Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 30:14:150.
doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1367_23. eCollection 2025.

Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review

Affiliations
Review

Hospital performance evaluation models: A scoping review

Shirin Alsadat Hadian et al. J Educ Health Promot. .

Abstract

Evaluating the performance of hospitals, the largest budget consumers of the health system, is challenging. This scoping review aimed to identify and classify hospital performance evaluation models and their dimensions. A literature search was conducted across three databases using keyword combinations. The studies included performance evaluation models along with evaluation of efficiency, effectiveness, and efficiency related to the hospital. Eighty English language studies published between 2012 and 2022, the majority from Iran, USA, Brazil, and China, were included. The extracted models were classified into two categories: quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative models were divided into two main groups: 'parametric' and 'non-parametric'. Parametric models were divided into four methods: regression models, stochastic frontier analysis, neural network models, and factor analysis. Non-parametric models can be classified into five groups: data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, multi-criteria decision-making methods, performance management models, service quality models, and other models. The DEA model, which includes extensive functions, was the most common model used for evaluating hospital performance. Quantitative models for evaluating hospital performance focused on performance and efficiency terms. A key priority for future research is to compare the extracted models with real data from different hospitals and provide the most useful model according to the contextual factors of the hospital.

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis (DEA); hospital; performance evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection and data abstraction

Similar articles

References

    1. Dubas-Jakóbczyk K, Kocot E, Tambor M, Quentin W. The association between hospital financial performance and the quality of care—A scoping review protocol. Syst Rev. 2021;10:221. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pitocco C, Sexton TR. Measuring hospital performance using mortality rates: An alternative to the RAMR. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2018;7:308–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buathong S, Bangchokdee S. The use of the performance measures in Thai public hospitals. ASIAN Rev Account. 2017;25:472–85.
    1. Meker T, Barlas Y. Dynamic Consequences of Performance-Based Payment Systems in Public Hospitals. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2015;32:459–80.
    1. Ghahremanloo M, Hasani A, Amiri M, Hashemi-Tabatabaei M, Keshavarz-Ghorabaee M, Ustinovičius L. A novel DEA model for hospital performance evaluation based on the measurement of efficiency, effectiveness, and productivity. Eng Manag Prod Serv. 2020;12:7–19.

LinkOut - more resources