Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 21;17(5):e84527.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.84527. eCollection 2025 May.

Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Intravenous Insulin Protocol Modified for East Asians in Postoperative Glycemic Management Following Pancreatectomy

Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of a Continuous Intravenous Insulin Protocol Modified for East Asians in Postoperative Glycemic Management Following Pancreatectomy

Hironobu Sasaki et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Introduction Glycemic control following pancreatectomy presents challenges, especially in patients with diabetes due to a lack of endogenous insulin, however, optimal management remains unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a continuous intravenous insulin infusion protocol employed at our institution, in comparison with conventional glycemic control in patients with pancreatectomy. Materials and methods Sixty-one patients with preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 6.5% or higher, on diabetes medications, or who underwent total pancreatectomy were included. Patients were categorized into three groups: insulin protocol (IP group, n = 24), subcutaneous injection (SI group, n = 15), and continuous intravenous insulin infusion based on the empirical control (EC group, n = 22). The primary outcomes were average blood glucose levels and the proportion of achievement within the target blood glucose range (140-180 mg/dl). Additionally, factors associated with the insulin dose in the IP group were analyzed. Results At predefined time points, the IP group achieved a significantly higher proportion of the target blood glucose range than the SI group (46.2% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.01), with no significant difference in average blood glucose levels (164.1 ± 41.8 vs. 169.1 ± 51.0 mg/dl, p = 0.50). During the 60-hour period following the initiation of frequent blood glucose measurements, the IP group demonstrated significantly reduced average blood glucose levels than the EC group (170.1 ± 56.0 vs. 175.5 ± 43.5 mg/dl, p <0.001), despite significantly longer measurement intervals (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.2 ± 0.7 hours, p <0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of the target blood glucose range between the IP and EC groups (37.2% vs. 41.0%, p = 0.11). Aspartate transaminase and alanine transferase levels on postoperative day one were positively correlated with the average insulin dose in the IP group (both R = 0.45, p = 0.03). Conclusions This IP helped stabilize blood glucose levels compared to subcutaneous injections and improved glycemic control more effectively than empirically administered continuous intravenous insulin infusion. Postoperative elevations in liver enzymes may serve as predictors of increased insulin requirements.

Keywords: diabetes; glycemic control; insulin protocol; intravenous insulin infusion; pancreatectomy; postoperative hyperglycemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flowchart of study participants.
HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Trend in postoperative blood glucose levels over 60 hours following the initiation of frequent measurements.
Values are mean ± standard deviation. * p <0.05 The number of patients included in the analysis is indicated below the figure. EC, Empirical control; IP, Insulin protocol.

Similar articles

References

    1. Stress hyperglycemia during surgery and anesthesia: pathogenesis and clinical implications. Palermo NE, Gianchandani RY, McDonnell ME, Alexanian SM. Curr Diab Rep. 2016;16:33. - PubMed
    1. Perioperative intensive insulin therapy using artificial endocrine pancreas in patients undergoing pancreatectomy. Maeda H, Okabayashi T, Yatabe T, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:4111–4115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyperglycemia and oxidative stress: an integral, updated and critical overview of their metabolic interconnections. González P, Lozano P, Ros G, Solano F. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Postoperative hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results from the Michigan surgical quality collaborative database. Mohan S, Kaoutzanis C, Welch KB, et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1515–1523. - PubMed
    1. Persistent postoperative hyperglycemia as a risk factor for operative treatment of deep wound infection after spine surgery. Pennington Z, Lubelski D, Westbroek EM, Ahmed AK, Passias PG, Sciubba DM. Neurosurgery. 2020;87:211–219. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources