A Phase 2 Trial of CPX-351 Combined With Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- PMID: 40401707
- DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27723
A Phase 2 Trial of CPX-351 Combined With Venetoclax in Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Abstract
Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) AML are poor. We sought to investigate if CPX-531 in combination with venetoclax (CPX + VEN) was tolerable and effective in RR AML. This was a single institution phase 1b/2 trial of CPX + VEN. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with RR AML who were fit for intensive chemotherapy were eligible. Prior venetoclax exposure was allowed. The phase 1b portion followed a 3 + 3 design to identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the expansion cohort. At the starting dose level of -1, prolonged myelosuppression was observed, leading to dose level -2 (CPX-351 dosed at daunorubicin 44 mg/m2 on days 1,3, and 5 and venetoclax 300 mg days 2-8) being chosen as the RP2D. Thirty three patients with a median age of 58 years (range, 26-72) were treated. Patients were heavily pretreated, with 58% with prior venetoclax exposure, 44% in the second salvage or later, and 30% with prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Adverse cytogenetics were present in 51% of patients, with myelodysplasia-related mutations in 64%, and TP53mut in 21%. The overall response rate (ORR) was 46% (95% CI, 30-62), with a composite CR rate (CRc) of 39% (95% CI, 25-56). Patients in first salvage with wildtype TP53 had a CRc rate of 70% (95% CI, 40-89), with undetectable MRD in 71% (95% CI, 36-92) and a 2-year OS of 49% (95% CI, 23-100). Eleven (73%) responding patients underwent SCT. The 30-day mortality was 9%, with a 60-day mortality of 21%. The most common adverse events were related to myelosuppression. CPX + VEN has activity in RR AML, particularly when used in first salvage and in patients who do not harbor TP53 mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03629171.
Keywords: AML; CPX‐VEN; clinical trial.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- C. D. DiNardo, B. A. Jonas, V. Pullarkat, et al., “Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia,” New England Journal of Medicine 383, no. 7 (2020): 617–629, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2012971.
-
- A. H. Wei, P. Montesinos, V. Ivanov, et al., “Venetoclax Plus LDAC for Newly Diagnosed AML Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo‐Controlled Trial,” Blood 135 (2020): 2137–2145.
-
- W. Y. Jen, K. Takahashi, S. Loghavi, et al., “FLAG‐IDA + Venetoclax in Newly Diagnosed (ND) or Relapsed/Refractory (RR) AML,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 42 (2024): 6519.
-
- C. D. DiNardo, C. A. Lachowiez, K. Takahashi, et al., “Venetoclax Combined With FLAG‐IDA Induction and Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 39, no. 25 (2021): 2768–2778, https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03736.
-
- C. D. DiNardo, C. A. Lachowiez, K. Takahashi, et al., “Venetoclax Combined With FLAG‐IDA Induction and Consolidation in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia,” American Journal of Hematology 97, no. 8 (2022): 1035–1043, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26601.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous