Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jul 1;111(7):4487-4494.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002514. Epub 2025 May 22.

Novel patient-specific instrument with comparable accuracy to robotic assistance in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

Guanglei Cao  1 , Mincong Du  1 , Zheng Li  2 , Shuai An  2 , Jiang Huang  2 , Shuo Liu  1 , Ye Huang  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Novel patient-specific instrument with comparable accuracy to robotic assistance in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective study

Guanglei Cao et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) can be applied in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to assist surgeons in planning and positioning prostheses. This study aims to compare the accuracy of prosthesis positioning in medial UKA performed with a newly designed PSI tool to those of UKA performed with robotic assistance and previously reported PSI-assisted techniques.

Materials and methods: Ninety-one patients underwent medial mobile-bearing UKA with the new PSI tool designed based on preoperative CT scans from May 2023 to June 2024. Deviations between planned and actual postoperative positions of femoral and tibial components in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes were measured with CT overlay, and root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated. Accuracy was benchmarked by comparing the proportion of deviations within 2° with published robotic-assisted UKA data. Median absolute deviation (MAD) was compared with those of previous PSI studies. Cases of prosthesis size adjustment and PSI failure were also recorded.

Result: RMSE values for femoral component angle deviations were 2.0°, 3.7°, and 2.8° in coronal, sagittal, and axial planes; for the tibial component, values were 1.5°, 1.8°, and 2.6°, respectively. MAD values were consistently low, and angular deviations were generally comparable or superior to robotic-assisted UKA. In 4 cases (4.4%), prosthetic size was adjusted intraoperatively.

Conclusion: The newly designed PSI tool effectively achieves the preoperative planning goals in medial mobile-bearing UKA. When compared with the published results of robotic-assisted and PSI-guided UKA, this tool provides comparable or even superior component positioning accuracy, demonstrating its potentials for wider clinical applications.

Keywords: clinical application; patient-specific instrumentation; prosthesis positioning; robotic assistance; unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Murray DW. Unicompartmental knee replacement: now or never? Orthopedics 2000;23:979–80.
    1. Ackroyd CE. Medial compartment arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:937–42.
    1. Registry NJ. National Joint Registry (NJR) for England, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Wales 15th Annual Report. 2018:26.
    1. van der List JP, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD. Why do medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties fail today? J Arthroplasty 2016;31:1016–21.
    1. Saleh ES, Hasan S, Jiranek WA. Subsidence of all-polyethylene tibial components used in unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cohort study. Cureus 2023;15:e39904.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources