Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 May 7;9(3):zraf027.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf027.

Predictors and risk model for positive circumferential resection margin after robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: retrospective cohort study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Predictors and risk model for positive circumferential resection margin after robot-assisted total mesorectal excision: retrospective cohort study

Ritch T J Geitenbeek et al. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) after total mesorectal excision (TME) is associated with higher local and systemic recurrence rates, affecting overall survival in patients with rectal cancer. Although risk factors for positive CRM have been identified for open, laparoscopic, and transanal TME, these may differ for robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (R-TME). This study aimed to assess the incidence of positive CRM following R-TME and identify the associated preoperative risk factors.

Method: An international multicentre retrospective study included patients receiving R-TME between January 2013 and January 2022 in centres based in the Netherlands, UK, and France. Endpoints were the incidence of and predictive factors for positive CRM. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and factors associated with positive CRM were then assessed by formulating a predictive model.

Results: A total of 1390 patients underwent R-TME, and the incidence of positive CRM was 6.0% (n = 83). Multivariable analysis revealed significant associations between positive CRM and cT4 tumours (OR 2.27), involved mesorectal fascia on staging magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis (OR 1.89), and non-sphincter-saving surgery (OR 2.22). The predictive model exhibited satisfactory discrimination (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve > 0.7) and predicted a 26% risk of positive CRM when all identified risk factors were present.

Conclusion: Preoperative tumour- and procedure-related factors, rather than patient-related factors, are associated with CRM involvement after R-TME. The proposed predictive model allows preoperative calculation of the risk of positive CRM, offering valuable insights for optimizing patient selection and tailoring treatment approaches to enhance oncological outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1986;327:1479–1482 - PubMed
    1. Chen K, Cao G, Chen B, Wang M, Xu X, Cai W et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies in the last 5 years. Int J Surg 2017;39:1–10 - PubMed
    1. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;318:1569–1580 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol 2008;26:303–312 - PubMed
    1. Quirke P, Dixon MF, Durdey P, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996–999 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources