Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Nov 1;36(11):2213-2227.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000716. Epub 2025 May 22.

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Vaccine Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Affiliations

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors and Vaccine Response in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Griffith B Perkins et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Key Points:

  1. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor–based immunosuppression was associated with an improved T-cell response to vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.

  2. Mice treated with an mTOR inhibitor exhibited improved T-cell responses to booster vaccination.

  3. Switching low and nonresponder kidney transplant recipients to an mTOR inhibitor did not improve T-cell response to a booster vaccination.

Background: Failure to develop protective immunity in response to vaccination is common among kidney transplant recipients, rendering them susceptible to severe infection. Novel strategies are required. Here, we investigated the potential of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors to improve vaccine responses.

Methods: Humoral and cellular responses to primary coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination (ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2) were assessed for kidney transplant recipients receiving mTOR inhibitor–based (mTOR inhibitor, mycophenolate, prednisolone, n=15) and standard-of-care (tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisolone, n=40) immunosuppression, and healthy cohabitants (n=71), in a prospective observational study. Findings were validated and mechanisms explored in mice. Low/nonresponding kidney transplant recipients receiving standard-of-care immunosuppression (N=54) were then randomized 1:1 to switch from mycophenolate to sirolimus or remain on standard of care for 4 weeks before receiving COVID-19 booster vaccination. Augmentation of immunity to COVID-19 was assessed as the primary outcome measure.

Results: A 12-fold greater IFNγ T-cell response to primary vaccination was observed in kidney transplant recipients receiving mTOR inhibitor–based versus standard-of-care immunosuppression (520 versus 43 spot-forming units/106 cells, P < 0.001). A greater frequency of functional memory T cells in the mTOR inhibitor group was observed for both the CD4+ (0.20% versus 0.05%, P < 0.001) and CD8+ (0.35% versus 0.07%, P = 0.006) compartments by flow cytometry, and kidney transplant recipients receiving mTOR inhibitor–based immunosuppression produced greater frequencies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2–specific CD4+ T cells than healthy cohabitants (1.17% versus 0.48%, P = 0.03). In mice, sirolimus treatment enhanced both recall and de novo T-cell responses to homologous and Omicron-specific booster vaccines. Switch from mycophenolate to sirolimus was well tolerated; however, no significant difference was observed in the proportion of kidney transplant recipients in the intervention and control arms that achieved protective virus neutralization (10/25 [40%] versus 9/21 [43%], respectively, P = 0.85) nor in T-cell response to vaccination (P = 0.89).

Conclusions: mTOR inhibition was associated with improved T-cell memory formation in kidney transplant recipients; however, this effect was not reproduced by a short-term mycophenolate to sirolimus switch strategy.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12621001412820.

Keywords: COVID-19; clinical trial; immunology; immunosuppression; kidney transplantation; randomized controlled trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure forms, as provided by each author, are available with the online version of the article at http://links.lww.com/JSN/F243.

References

    1. Phanish M Ster IC Ghazanfar A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 and kidney transplant recipients, the South West London Kidney Transplant Network experience. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(3):574–585. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cochran W Shah P Barker L, et al. COVID-19 clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients during the Omicron surge. Transplantation. 2022;106(7):e346–e347. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004162 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Callaghan CJ Mumford L Curtis RM, et al.; the NHSBT Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Clinical Team. Real-world effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in solid organ and islet transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2022;106(3):436–446. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004059 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charmetant X Espi M Benotmane I, et al. Infection or a third dose of mRNA vaccine elicits neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14(636):eabl6141. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abl6141 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benotmane I Gautier G Perrin P, et al. Antibody response after a third dose of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients with minimal serologic response to 2 doses. JAMA. 2021;326(11):1063–1065. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12339 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources