Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug:82:104505.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104505. Epub 2025 May 15.

Clinical genome sequencing in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: Concept, implementation and benefits

Affiliations

Clinical genome sequencing in patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: Concept, implementation and benefits

Dennis Witt et al. Breast. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is one of the most frequent genetic cancer predisposition syndromes. Individuals at risk are identified mainly by family history and histopathological criteria. The current standard genetic testing is exome or panel sequencing. However, many high-risk families remain genetically unexplained. Genome sequencing has the potential to increase the diagnostic yield. This single-center real-world study aims to evaluate advantages of short-read genome sequencing (GS) in HBOC families. We report genome sequencing results of 818 index patients, who fulfilled clinical criteria for genetic testing. Data analysis showed less sequencing gaps and a more uniform coverage compared to a large cohort of in-house exomes. Samples were sequenced at an average depth of 41.2x for the HBOC core genes. Pathogenic variants were found in 9 of 13 core genes in 12.2 % of the patients. GS allowed the classification of a BRCA1 duplication and detected a whole-exon inversion in BARD1, as well as a deep intronic CHEK2 variant. Furthermore, we successfully used the BRIDGES-PRS in our HBOC cohort and found a significant effect size compared to the control cohort (p = 4.804-14, Cohen's-D: 0.476), proving the transferability to a German cohort. GS offers a wealth of information, including the improved detection of structural variants, copy number variants, and parallel detection of complex genetic markers. This has the potential for future analyses, including intronic and intergenic regions. Finally, it also allows for a more streamlined process by converging several tests into one. The approach presented will give guidance for the implementation of GS in HBOC diagnostics.

Keywords: Clinical genome sequencing; HBOC; Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; Next-generation sequencing; PRS; Polygenic risk scores; Short read sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Dennis Witt:I have no competing interest to declare. Ulrike Faust:Has no competing interest to declare. Marc Sturm:Has no competing interest to declare. Antje Stäbler:Has no competing interest to declare. Benita Menden:Has no competing interest to declare. Lisa T. Ruisinger:Has no competing interest to declare. Kristin Bosse:Has no competing interest to declare. Ines Gruber:Has no competing interest to declare. Andreas Hartkopf:Has no competing interest to declare. Silja Gauss:Has no competing interest to declare. German Demidov:Has received research funding by European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 779257 and has received fees for consulting by Diagenius BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Both instances are not associated with the current paper. Nicolas Casadei:Has received research funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under the ID INST 37/1049-1 and received payment for lectures at university of Reutlingen. Elena Buena Atienza:Has received research funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under the ID INST 37/1049-1. Janna Witt:Has no competing interest to declare. Caspar Gross:Has no competing interest to declare. Leon Schütz:Has no competing interest to declare. Stephan Ossowski:Has received research funding by Illumina Inc and Honoraria from Illumina Inc. For a presentation at GfH conference 2023 as well as support for attending meetings at Illumina and ONT in 2023. Andreas Dufke:Has no competing interest to declare. Tobias Haack:Has received research funding by Illumina Inc. Olaf Riess:Has received research funding by Illumina Inc and German Research Foundation and EU funding and German ministry of Health. Olaf Riess is also Representative of the German Ministry of Health in the European + MG Project (unpaid). Christopher Schroeder:Has received research funding by Illumina Inc.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart: HBOC diagnostic concept. Blue: routine diagnostics, which were performed for every patient; orange: case based verification of insertion site of duplicated regions of unsolved, structural variants; green: case based extended research; pink: optional screening for (likely) pathogenic variants in actionable genes. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Structural variants of interest (visual illustration): Structural variants detected by short-read GS and long-read GS. Panel A shows a tandem duplication of exon 12 of BRCA1 identified by short-read GS. The detection of a tandem duplication is possible through the interpretation of split reads from which information regarding the localization of the breakpoints can be obtained. Panel B presents a tandem duplication of exons 62 and 63 of the ATM gene, identified by long-read GS. Short-read GS did not span the flanking repeats and therefore the exact breakpoint position could not be detected. Question marks in panel B indicate the potential location of the break point and uncertainty on a base pair resolution due to the repetitive structure.

References

    1. Hauke J. Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1/2-negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting: results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Med, Bd. Apr. 2018;(7):1349–1358. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1376. u. a. Nr. 4, S. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breast Cancer Association Consortium „Breast cancer risk genes — association analysis in more than 113,000 women. N Engl J Med. Feb. 2021:428–439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913948. Bd. 384, Nr. 5, S. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rhiem K. Consensus Recommendations of the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Care. Apr. 2022:199–207. doi: 10.1159/000516376. u. a. Bd. 17, Nr. 2, S. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoshida R. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC): review of its molecular characteristics, screening, treatment, and prognosis. Breast Cancer. Nov. 2021:1167–1180. doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01148-2. Bd. 28, Nr. 6, S. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kast K. Prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in 21 401 families with breast and ovarian cancer. J Med Genet. Juli 2016:465–471. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103672. u. a. Bd. 53, Nr. 7, S. - DOI - PubMed