Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;70(3):239-247.e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.05.009. Epub 2025 May 20.

Primary Mental Health Competencies for Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physicians: A Delphi Study

Lisa Podgurski  1 , Danielle Chammas  2 , Keri O Brenner  3 , Leah B Rosenberg  4 , Neha G Goyal  5 , Maria I Lapid  6 , Sue E Morris  7 , William F Pirl  7 , Bridget Sumser  2 , Benjamin W Thompson  8 , Lindsey Wright  9 , Daniel Shalev  10
Affiliations

Primary Mental Health Competencies for Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physicians: A Delphi Study

Lisa Podgurski et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Context: Psychiatric and psychological care in serious illness is a core domain of hospice and palliative medicine (HPM), encompassing both normative psychosocial responses and mental health comorbidities. While social workers serve as psychosocial leaders on HPM interdisciplinary teams, commitment to supporting whole-person care remains the responsibility of the entire team. However, training and scope of practice for HPM physicians in the mental health domain are poorly standardized.

Objectives: To establish and prioritize "primary mental health competencies" for specialist hospice and palliative medicine physicians using expert consensus methods.

Methods: We convened a panel of eight physicians, one social worker, two psychologists, and one nurse practitioner with expertise at the intersection of palliative care and mental health. Using group meetings and 1:1 interviews with the project leads, the expert panel generated initial competencies. A purposive voting panel of 36 palliative care physicians representing a range of practice settings and areas of career focus finalized high-priority competencies using a two-phase modified Delphi approach.

Results: The expert panel proposed 68 competencies divided into: (A) psychological foundations of serious illness care, (B) diagnosis and management of mental health disorders in serious illness, and (C) systems-based practice. After first-round voting, 23 competencies were recirculated for a second vote. Following second-round voting, 32 competencies were included in the final list: seven from part A, 20 from part B, and five from part C.

Conclusions: This consensus-based, expert-led process successfully generated and prioritized essential competencies in the psychological and psychiatric aspects of palliative care for specialist physicians.

Keywords: Palliative care; competencies; mental health; physician training; psychiatric; psychological.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures and Acknowledgments Author DS is an editorial board member of the Journal of Pain and Symptom Management but has no role in the editorial or review process of this manuscript. Author DS was supported by National Institute on Aging grant 1K76AG083287. We would like to thank the 36 members of the Delphi voting panel who generously contributed their time and perspectives to this project, including (alphabetically): Mark Adams, Robert Arnold, Michael Barnett, Susan Block, Mary Buss, Mary Callahan, Laura Cantino, Elise Carey, Julie Childers, Kathleen Doyle, Alex Gamble, Elizabeth Gobbi, Jillian Gustin, Shireen Heidari, Vicki Jackson, Chris Jones, Linda King, Jordana Meyerson, Paul Noufi, Lynn O’Neill, Eva Reitschuler-Cross, Morvarid Rezaie, Kathy Selvaggi, Dillon Stein, Jason Webb, Erin Zahradnik, Carly Zapata, and Donna Zhukovsky. We also wish to acknowledge the input of Rene Claxton for her medical education expertise and input into the study design and presentation.

References

    1. van Oorschot B, Ishii K, Kusomoto Y, et al. Anxiety, depression and psychosocial needs are the most frequent concerns reported by patients: preliminary results of a comparative explorative analysis of two hospital-based palliative care teams in Germany and Japan. J Neural Transm Vienna Austria 1996 2020;127(11):1481–1489. 10.1007/s00702-020-02186-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shalev D, Robbins-Welty G, Ekwebelem M, et al. Mental health integration and delivery in the hospice and palliative medicine setting: a national survey of clinicians. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.025. S0885-3924(23)00713-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrell BR, Twaddle ML, Melnick A, Meier DE. National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for quality palliative care guidelines, 4th Edition. J Palliat Med 2018;21 (12):1684–1689. 10.1089/jpm.2018.0431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shalev D, Brenner KO, Fitzgerald Jones K, et al. Realizing the imperative: the future of mental health and palliative care integration. J Palliat Med 2024. 10.1089/jpm.2024.0460. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tewes M, Rettler T, Wolf N, et al. Predictors of outpatients’ request for palliative care service at a medical oncology clinic of a German comprehensive cancer center. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 2018;26(10):3641–3647. 10.1007/s00520-018-4245-7. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources