Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 22;24(1):145.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01770-x.

Perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making in hospice care for advanced cancer patients in Nanjing: a descriptive qualitative study

Tianyu Pang  1   2 , Kairan Yan  2 , Yujie Zhou  2 , Lulu Sun  3 , Ligui Wu  3 , Ling Yuan  4 , Zhi Zhou  5
Affiliations

Perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making in hospice care for advanced cancer patients in Nanjing: a descriptive qualitative study

Tianyu Pang et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: As the cancer burden increases in China, the need for hospice care is escalating. The right of informed consent to hospice care for patients with advanced cancer is still at the experimental stage, and patients still face numerous obstacles when it comes to participating in hospice care decision-making. In this context, we conducted a qualitative study to explore perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making (SDM) in hospice care for advanced cancer patients.

Methods: This study employed a descriptive phenomenological research method. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians recruited from 4 hospital in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China from January to March 2023. Two researchers used Colaizzi 7-step analysis method to analyze, summarize, integrate and refine the data.

Results: A total of 17 clinicians participated. Three main themes were extracted: (1) Clinician attitudes regarding SDM; (2) Influencing factors are multidimensional; (3) Recommendations for implementing SDM in hospice care decision-making.

Conclusion: SDM in hospice care for advanced cancer patients was affected by multiple factors in medical practice. It is highly desirable to focus on improving the decision support system, optimizing the SDM model of hospice care to ensure the informed choice of patients with advanced cancer.

Keywords: Advanced cancer; Clinicians; Hospice care; Perspectives; Qualitative research; Shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participant: This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School (NO. 2022-743-01). Furthermore, this study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and all the participants of this research provided their written informed consent prior to data collection. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, et al. Cancer statistics in China and united States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med(Engl). 2022;135(5):584–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. - PubMed
    1. Currow D C, Agar M R, Phillips JL. Role of hospice care at the end of life for people with Cancer [J]. J Clin Oncology: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2020;38(9):937–43. - PubMed
    1. Hoomani Majdabadi F, Ashktorab T. Impact of palliative care on quality of life in advanced cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J]. Eur J Cancer Care. 2022;31(6):e13647. - PubMed
    1. Patel M N, Nicolla J M, Friedman F A P, et al. Hospice use among patients with cancer: trends, barriers, and future directions [J]. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(12):803–9. - PubMed