Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 8:15:1578991.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1578991. eCollection 2025.

Artificial intelligence-based automated breast ultrasound radiomics for breast tumor diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Artificial intelligence-based automated breast ultrasound radiomics for breast tumor diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review

Yinglin Guo et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor among women worldwide, posing a substantial threat to their health and overall quality of life. Consequently, for early-stage BC, timely screening, accurate diagnosis, and the development of personalized treatment strategies are crucial for enhancing patient survival rates. Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) addresses the limitations of traditional handheld ultrasound (HHUS), such as operator dependency and inter-observer variability, by providing a more comprehensive and standardized approach to BC detection and diagnosis. Radiomics, an emerging field, focuses on extracting high-dimensional quantitative features from medical imaging data and utilizing them to construct predictive models for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment evaluation. In recent years, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with radiomics has significantly enhanced the process of analyzing and extracting meaningful features from large and complex radiomic datasets through the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms. Recently, AI-based ABUS radiomics has demonstrated significant potential in the diagnosis and therapeutic evaluation of BC. However, despite the notable performance and application potential of ML and DL models based on ABUS, the inherent variability in the analyzed data highlights the need for further evaluation of these models to ensure their reliability in clinical applications.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; automatic breast ultrasound; breast; breast tumor; deep learning; machine learning; radiomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A set of 3-D ABUS images generated by Invenia ABUS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The radiomics workflow for ABUS imaging integrates two distinct methodologies. Traditional machine learning relies on manual processes including image acquisition, feature extraction and selection, followed by model construction to complete tasks. Deep learning primarily employs convolutional neural networks (CNN) composed of three core components: convolutional layers for local feature extraction, pooling layers for dimensionality reduction, and fully connected layers that map extracted features to output layers for final task execution. SVM, Support Vector Machine; LASSO, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator; RF, Random Forest; ROC, Receiver Operating Characteristic.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ibraheem SA, Mahmud R, Mohamad Saini S, Abu Hassan H, Keiteb AS, Dirie AM. Evaluation of diagnostic performance of automatic breast volume scanner compared to handheld ultrasound on different breast lesions: A systematic review. Diagn (Basel). (2022) 12(2):541. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020541 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zanotel M, Bednarova I, Londero V, Linda A, Lorenzon M, Girometti R, et al. . Automated breast ultrasound: basic principles and emerging clinical applications. Radiol Med. (2018) 123:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0805-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology. (2009) 252:665–72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2523080670 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arimura H, Soufi M, Ninomiya K, Kamezawa H, Yamada M. Potentials of radiomics for cancer diagnosis and treatment in comparison with computer-aided diagnosis. Radiol Phys Technol. (2018) 11:365–74. doi: 10.1007/s12194-018-0486-x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources