Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 31;4(2):130-140.
doi: 10.1097/FM9.0000000000000141. eCollection 2022 Apr.

Computerized Analysis of Antepartum Cardiotocography: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Computerized Analysis of Antepartum Cardiotocography: A Review

Gabriel Davis Jones et al. Matern Fetal Med. .

Abstract

Cardiotocography measures the human fetal heart rate and uterine activity using ultrasound. While it has been a mainstay in antepartum care since the 1960s, cardiotocograms consist of complex signals that have proven difficult for clinicians to interpret accurately and as such clinical inference is often difficult and unreliable. Previous attempts at codifying approaches to analyzing the features within these signals have failed to demonstrate reliability or gain sufficient traction. Since the early 1990s, the Dawes-Redman system of automated computer analysis of cardiotocography signals has enabled robust analysis of cardiotocographic signal features, employing empirically-derived criteria for assessing fetal wellbeing in the antepartum. Over the past 30 years, the Dawes-Redman system has been iteratively updated, now incorporating analyses from over 100,000 pregnancies. In this review, we examine the history of cardiotocography, signal processing methodologies and feature identification, the development of the Dawes-Redman system, and its clinical applications.

Keywords: Antepartum; Cardiotocography; Computerized; Electronic fetal monitoring; Fetal monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Fitting a baseline using the Dawes-Redman method (Table 1). The most frequently occurring pulse interval is 427 ms (∼140 bpm, orange arrow) and occurs in 6.08% of all pulses in the first ten minutes. The frequency of the lower five pulse intervals is less than the frequency of the most frequently occurring pulse interval (seven, green line). The PI sits in the lower 87.5% of the frequency distribution of all pulse intervals. Therefore, the parameters of the bandpass filter applied to this CTG recording would be 427 ± 60ms, or (367,487), corresponding to a FHR range of 123–163 bpm. This is then iteratively updated as the recording progresses. bpm: Beats per minute; CTG: Cardiotocography; FHR: Fetal heart rate; PI: Pulse interval.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
An example of a complex antepartum CTG signal containing clustered accelerations and decelerations. This signal contains large decelerations, some with >20 lost beats per minute or lasting up to one minute. These patterns were identified with the Dawes-Redman computerized CTG system after baseline fitting. This CTG was performed on a singleton pregnancy at 35 weeks gestation and the fetus was delivered at 40 weeks without any adverse outcomes. bpm: Beats per minute; CTG: Cardiotocography; FHR: Fetal heart rate.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Episodes of high variation in a fetus at 37 gestational weeks. The short-term variation was 13.35 ms and the long-term variation 70.60 ms. This record contains three accelerations, no decelerations, and no episodes of low variability. This fetus had normal outcomes. bpm: Beats per minute; CTG: Cardiotocography; FHR: Fetal heart rate.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Comparison of a normal antepartum CTG pattern (blue) and a sinusoidal pattern (red) of two fetuses at 39 gestational weeks. The sinusoidal pattern is smooth, regular, and oscillates between 3 and 4 cycles (high frequency sinusoidal pattern) per minute with an amplitude between 5 and 15 bpm around the baseline heart rate. There is reduced baseline variability and no accelerations are present. This baby was acidaemic (pH = 7.07), had low Apgar scores, and required intubation. bpm: Beats per minute; CTG: Cardiotocography.

References

    1. Pardey J, Moulden M, Redman CW. A computer system for the numerical analysis of nonstress tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186(5):1095–1103. doi:10.1067/mob.2002.122447. - PubMed
    1. Timor-Tritsch IE, Dierker LJ, Hertz RH, et al. . Studies of antepartum behavioral state in the human fetus at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;132(5):524–528. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(78)90747-0. - PubMed
    1. Popescu EA, Popescu M, Bennett TL, et al. . Magnetographic assessment of fetal hiccups and their effect on fetal heart rhythm. Physiol Meas 2007;28(6):665–676. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/28/6/005. - PubMed
    1. Visser GH, Poelmann-Weesjes G, Cohen TM, et al. . Fetal behavior at 30 to 32 weeks of gestation. Pediatr Res 1987;22(6):655–658. doi:10.1203/00006450-198712000-00009. - PubMed
    1. Horne RSC. Duncan JR, Byard RW. Autonomic cardiorespiratory physiology and arousal of the fetus and infant. SIDS Sudden Infant and Early Childhood Death: The Past, the Present and the Future Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide Press; 2018. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources