Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug;40(8):1876-1889.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.17013. Epub 2025 May 23.

Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: A Joint Position Statement

Linda S Yang  1 , Abir Halder  2 , Bronte A Holt  1 , Benedict Devereaux  3 , Matthew Remedios  4 , Neil Merrett  5   6 , Marianne Lill  7 , Zoe Raos  8 , Malcolm Arnold  9 , Nicholas G Burgess  10   11 , Sneha John  12 , Krish Ragunath  2   13
Affiliations
Review

Quality Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: A Joint Position Statement

Linda S Yang et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Quality standards for upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy are required to identify key quality indicators that are relevant to Australasian endoscopic practice and local patient populations. Such standards will promote equitable access to high-quality UGI endoscopy for appropriate indications across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The Gastroenterological Society of Australia (GESA) Endoscopy Faculty's quality of UGI endoscopy working group conducted a review of published guidelines on quality standards in UGI endoscopy. A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE database, with further references sourced from bibliographies of published papers. Recommendations from international guidelines and available evidence were reviewed, and their relevance to the Australian clinical context was assessed. The working group then formulated a position statement on quality assurance in UGI endoscopy in Australian practice. A further iterative process involving the Endoscopy Guidance Group for New Zealand (EGGNZ) and the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) culminated in the final recommendations for practice in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. The recommendations in this position statement are categorized into preprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural. As UGI endoscopy examines several anatomical structures and is performed for a wider range of indications than colonoscopy, disease-specific intraprocedural recommendations for common benign and premalignant conditions of the UGI tract are also presented. This GESA initiative was undertaken in collaboration with the RACS and endorsed by GESA, RACS, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, and EGGNZ, membership of which includes the New Zealand Society of Gastroenterology, the New Zealand Association of General Surgeons, and other local endoscopy stakeholders.

Keywords: endoscopy; gastroscopy; quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Anatomical landmarks for photo documentation in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Recommended biopsies in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. D1, duodenal bulb; D2, second part of the duodenum. Note: Figure produced by Medical Illustrations Department, Royal Perth Hospital.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care , “Chapter 5: Gastrointestinal Investigations,” in The Fourth Australian Atlas of Healthcare Variation (Sydney Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, 2021).
    1. Tjaden J. M., Hause J. A., Berger D., et al., “Adenoma Detection Rate Metrics in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance Colonoscopy,” Surgical Endoscopy 32, no. 7 (2018): 3108–3113. - PubMed
    1. Goh E., Guerin A., Lazier J., et al., “Choosing Wisely Canada: The Canadian College of Medical Geneticists' (CCMG) List of Five Items Physicians and Patients Should Question,” Journal of Medical Genetics 55, no. 2 (2018): 86–88. - PubMed
    1. Beg S., Ragunath K., Wyman A., et al., “Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Position Statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS),” Gut 66, no. 11 (2017): 1886–1899, 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bisschops R., Areia M., Coron E., et al., “Performance Measures for Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative,” United European Gastroenterology Journal 4, no. 5 (2016): 629–656. - PMC - PubMed