Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;56(8):2101-2109.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.125.050366. Epub 2025 May 23.

Preventive Effects of Prasugrel on Cerebrovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Collaborators, Affiliations

Preventive Effects of Prasugrel on Cerebrovascular Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Hisaki Makimoto et al. Stroke. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Dual antiplatelet drug administration is recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) stent placement. Although prasugrel, a newer P2Y12 inhibitor, reportedly suppresses cardiovascular events more effectively than the traditional agent clopidogrel, its preventive effects on cerebrovascular disorders remain a topic of ongoing debate. This study aimed to examine the cerebrovascular efficacy and safety of post-PCI prasugrel and clopidogrel using extensive real-world data in Japan.

Methods: Using the CLIDAS (Clinical Deep Data Accumulation System) database, 7412 post-PCI patients who received dual antiplatelet therapy between April 2013 and March 2019 were identified. The primary end point was defined as the incidence of any stroke, while secondary end points included individual ischemic and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular events. The incidence of cerebrovascular events was compared between the prasugrel (2.5-3.75 mg daily; n=2219) and clopidogrel (75 mg daily; n=5193) groups using propensity-score inverse probability of treatment weighting and Fine and Gray models to account for competing risks.

Results: Within 1 year after PCI, the prasugrel group had a significantly lower incidence of cerebrovascular events (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.91]; P=0.027) than the clopidogrel group. The subgroup analyses did not show significant differences in the incidence of ischemic (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.25-1.14]; P=0.11) and hemorrhagic cerebrovascular events (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.084-1.10]; P=0.070) between the use of prasugrel and clopidogrel. One-year health care costs between patients treated with prasugrel and those treated with clopidogrel showed no significant differences.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that post-PCI prasugrel use was associated with lower cerebrovascular events compared with the use of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin. Further research is necessary to substantiate the potential of prasugrel in lowering cerebrovascular risks after post-PCI while upholding a satisfactory safety profile.

Keywords: clopidogrel; health care costs; percutaneous coronary intervention; prasugrel hydrochloride; probability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Makimoto has received speaker honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd. Dr Kiyosue has received compensation from Kowa Company, Ltd, for other services. Dr Tsujita reports grants from Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd; grants from Medtronic Japan Co, Ltd; compensation from Novartis Pharma K.K., for other services; grants from Mochida Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; grants from Mochida Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; grants from TERUMO Co, Ltd; grants from Boston Scientific Japan; grants from Japan Lifeline Co, Ltd; grants from Kaneka Medix Co, Ltd; grants from Philips Japan, Ltd; compensation from TERUMO Co, Ltd, for other services; grants from OrbusNeich Medical K.K.; compensation from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co, Ltd, forother services; grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Japan; grants from Fukuda Denshi Co, Ltd; compensation from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, for other services; compensation from Abbott Medical Co, Ltd, for other services; grants from AMI Co, Ltd; grants from Novo Nordisk Pharma, Ltd; compensation from Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd, for other services; grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; compensation from Kowa Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, for other services; grants from GM Medical Co, Ltd; grants from Fukuda Denshi Co, Ltd; grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; grants from Nipro Corporation; grants from Medtronic Japan Co, Ltd; grants from Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd; grants from Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; grants from OrbusNeich Medical K.K.; grants from Fides One, Inc; grants from Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd; compensation from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, for other services; compensation from TERUMO Co, Ltd, for other services; grants from PRA Health Sciences; compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd, for other services; compensation from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co, Ltd, for other services; compensation from Pfizer Japan, Inc, for other services; grants from Abbott Japan; compensation from Amgen K.K. for other services; grants from Johnson & Johnson K.K.; grants from Biotronik Japan, Inc; grants from Fides One, Inc; grants from Novo Nordisk Pharma, Ltd; grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd; grants from Abbott Medical Co, Ltd; compensation from Abbott Medical Co, Ltd, for other services; compensation from TERUMO Co, Ltd, for other services; grants from Bristol-Myers K.K.; grants from ITI Co, Ltd; grants from EA Pharma Co, Ltd; grants from Edwards Lifesciences Corporation; grants from GM Medical Co, Ltd; compensation from Pfizer Japan, Inc, for other services; compensation from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, for other services; grants from ITI Co, Ltd; grants from Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd; and grants from Getinge Group Japan K.K. Dr Matoba reports grants from Amgen, Inc; grants from Kowa Company, Ltd; and compensation from Bayer for other services. Dr Nagai reports grants from Kowa Company, Ltd; grants from Novartis; and compensation from Kowa Company, Ltd, for other services. The other authors report no conflicts.