Pooled Analysis of Three MicroShunt Studies in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Evaluating Different Concentrations of Applied Mitomycin C
- PMID: 40408035
- PMCID: PMC12167400
- DOI: 10.1007/s40123-025-01149-4
Pooled Analysis of Three MicroShunt Studies in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Evaluating Different Concentrations of Applied Mitomycin C
Abstract
Introduction: The PRESERFLO MicroShunt is an 8.5-mm-long (70-µm lumen) controlled ab externo filtration surgery device made from poly[styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene] (SIBS). Three prospective, open-label clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00772330; NCT01563237; NCT02177123) evaluated the 2-year effectiveness and safety of MicroShunt implantation plus mitomycin C (MMC). This pooled analysis compared outcomes in patients receiving 0.2 or 0.4 mg/ml MMC during MicroShunt implantation.
Methods: Patients aged 18-85 years with primary open-angle glaucoma (intraocular pressure [IOP] 18-35 mmHg) uncontrolled on maximal tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warranted surgery who underwent MicroShunt implantation with/without cataract surgery, and with adjunctive use of 0.2 or 0.4 mg/ml MMC. Two-year outcomes included changes in IOP and glaucoma medications, complete success rates (IOP ≥ 6 to < 14 mmHg or ≥ 20% reduction, without medications), and rates of procedure/device-related adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs).
Results: Of the 125 included patients, 58 received 0.2 mg/ml MMC and 67 received 0.4 mg/ml MMC). Mean percent reduction in IOP was significantly greater in patients receiving 0.4 than 0.2 mg/ml MMC (- 40.9% vs. - 34.5%, P < 0.05). Mean glaucoma medication use was reduced to a lower level between baseline and year 2 in the 0.4 than in the 0.2 mg/ml MMC group. At year 2, the percentage of medication-free patients (85.2% vs. 58.0%, P < 0.01) and the complete success rates (71.6% vs. 48.3%, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the 0.4 than in the 0.2 mg/ml MMC group. Rates of procedure/device-related AEs and SAEs did not differ significantly in the two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: IOP and glaucoma medication use at year 2 were lower, and complete success rate was higher, in patients administered 0.4 mg/ml than 0.2 mg/ml MMC. Although there is no consensus on the optimal concentration of MMC, these findings may guide surgeons until further evidence from controlled trials becomes available.
Keywords: Antifibrotic agents; Glaucoma filtration surgery; MMC; MicroShunt; Primary open-angle glaucoma; SIBS.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Julian Garcia-Feijoo: Consultant—Alcon, AbbVie, Glaukos, iSTAR, Santen; Thea; Sight Science; Alimera; Elios Vision; Financial support—Alcon, AbbVie, iSTAR, Novartis, Théa, Glaukos, Pfizer, Santen, Elios, ZEISS; Heidelberg; AJL; J&J; B&L; Thea; Sight Science; Rayner; Cutting Edge; Physiol; Biotech and Pfizer. Juan F. Batlle: Consultant—Santen Inc., Aquea Health, W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.; Paid speaker—Johnson & Johnson Vision; Research support—CORD LLC, InnFocus Inc. (a Santen Pharmaceutical Co Ltd Company), Johnson & Johnson Vision, LensGen Inc., New World Medical Inc., Omega Ophthalmics, Inc., TECLens LLC; Investment interest: Aquea Health, CORD LLC, LensGen Inc. Florent Aptel: Consultant—Allergan, Glaukos, Novartis, Santen, Théa. Yves Lachkar: Consultant for Allergan, Novartis, Santen, Théa. Isabelle Riss: Consultant—Santen; Research support—Santen. Omar Sadruddin: is an employee of Glaukos. Tuan Nguyen: is an employee of Edwards Lifesciences. Henny J.M. Beckers: Consultant—InnFocus Inc. (a Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. company), Santen, Glaukos, AbbVie, Novartis, Théa, Elios, Nova Eye Medical; Research support—InnFocus Inc. (a Santen Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. company); Investment interest: Peyeoneer Medtech B.V. Ethical Approval: The individual studies were conducted in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the following medical device standards: CFR 21 (INN003 only), MEDDEV 2.12-1 and MEDDEV 2.12/2 revision 2 (INN007 only), MEDDEV 2.7/1 and the European Directive 93/42/EEC (INN004 and INN007 only), and EN ISO 14155 (INN003, INN004, and INN007). Each study site obtained institutional review board approval. Informed consent was gained from all patients prior to enrollment in the individual studies.
Figures
References
-
- Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5:e1221–34. - PubMed
-
- Mantravadi AV, Vadhar N. Glaucoma. Prim Care. 2015;42:437–49. - PubMed
-
- Gedde SJ, Vinod K, Wright MM, American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Glaucoma Panel, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:P71-150. - PubMed
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
