The immunotherapy breakthroughs in cervical cancer: Focus on potential biomarkers and further therapy advances
- PMID: 40408553
- PMCID: PMC12461279
- DOI: 10.17305/bb.2025.12597
The immunotherapy breakthroughs in cervical cancer: Focus on potential biomarkers and further therapy advances
Abstract
Despite the well-established role of human papillomavirus (HPV) as the primary cause of cervical cancer (CC) and the existence of an effective HPV vaccine, over half a million women are diagnosed with CC globally each year, with more than half of them dying from the disease. Immunotherapy has rapidly become a cornerstone of cancer treatment, offering substantial improvements in survival rates and reducing treatment-related side effects compared to traditional therapies. For the past 25 years, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been the standard treatment for locally advanced CC (LACC). However, while adjuvant chemotherapy has failed to improve outcomes in LACC, the integration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with CRT, as well as chemoimmunoradiotherapy followed by consolidation immunotherapy, has transformed treatment strategies, demonstrating superior efficacy compared to CRT alone. In the first-line treatment of CC, adding pembrolizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy, either with or without bevacizumab, has significantly improved outcomes compared to platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone. This review explores the current landscape of immunotherapy and biomarker advancements in CC. Furthermore, we discuss promising future directions, including the potential of personalized immunotherapy approaches and novel combination therapies to further enhance treatment efficacy and improve prognoses for patients with CC.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: Gordan Srkalović received honoraria from the Recordati Rare Diseases Speakers’ Bureau. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–63. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21834. - PubMed
-
- Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Dyba T, Randi G, Bettio M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers in 2018. Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;103:356–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005. - PubMed
-
- Kashyap N, Krishnan N, Kaur S, Ghai S. Risk factors of cervical cancer: a case-control study. Asia-Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2019;6(3):308–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon_73_18. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ryzhov A, Corbex M, Piñeros M, Barchuk A, Andreasyan D, Djanklich S, et al. Comparison of breast cancer and cervical cancer stage distributions in ten newly independent states of the former Soviet Union: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):361–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30674-4. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Renna Junior NL, Silva GAE. Temporal trend and associated factors to advanced stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer: analysis of data from hospital based cancer registries in Brazil, 2000-2012. Epidemiol E Serv Saude. 2018;27(2):e2017285. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1624580. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
