Derivation and Validation of ESC-0/1-h Algorithm for High-Sensitivity Troponin T and I in Cancer Patients
- PMID: 40408798
- PMCID: PMC12152628
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101821
Derivation and Validation of ESC-0/1-h Algorithm for High-Sensitivity Troponin T and I in Cancer Patients
Abstract
Background: The diagnostic performance of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T/I (hs-cTnT/I) and the efficacy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1-h hs-cTnT/I algorithms for the early diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction are lower in cancer patients.
Objectives: The authors aimed to derive new cutoffs for ESC 0/1-h hs-cTnT/I algorithms optimized for use in patients with active or past cancer.
Methods: Patients presenting with suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction to the emergency department enrolled in an international multicenter study were analyzed. Final diagnoses were centrally adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists according to the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. External validation was performed in 2 independent cohorts.
Results: Among 541 eligible cancer patients, cancer-optimized ESC 0/1-h hs-cTnT cutoffs, <8 ng/L at presentation (if chest pain onset >3 hours) or <14 ng/L if 0/1 h-delta is <3 ng/L for rule-out and ≥54 ng/L or 0/1-h delta ≥4 ng/L for rule-in, increased the efficacy vs the current cutoffs from 58.6% (95% CI: 54.4-62.7) to 68.0% (95% CI: 64.0-71.8; P < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity remained high and comparable. Similarly, among 516 eligible patients, cancer-optimized ESC 0/1-h hs-cTnI-Architect cutoffs, <7 ng/L at presentation (if chest pain onset >3 hours) or <10 ng/L if 0/1-h delta is <3 ng/L for rule-out and ≥61 ng/L or 0/1-h delta ≥5 ng/L for rule-in, increased the efficacy vs the current cutoffs from 59.3% (95% CI: 55.0-63.5) to 78.9% (95% CI: 75.2-82.2; P < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity again remained high and comparable. Findings were confirmed in internal and external validation cohorts (n = 130 and n = 195 patients, respectively).
Conclusions: Cancer-optimized ESC 0/1-h hs-cTnT/I algorithm cutoffs increased efficacy maintaining high safety.
Keywords: cancer; cardiac troponin; cutoffs; diagnosis; myocardial infarction; prognosis.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding support and author disclosures APACE was supported by research grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the University Hospital Basel, the University of Basel, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Idorsia, LSI-Medience, Roche, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Quidel, Siemens, SpinChip, and Singulex. The Turin-cancer cohort study was supported by the Fondazione Ricerca Molinette (Torino, Italy; Bando d'Eccellenza 2023 to EL) and by the Università degli Studi di Torino (grants MORF_RILO_21_02 and 23_03 to FM). We disclose that Dr Bima has received a research grant from the Swiss Heart Foundation (FF23062), unrelated to the present work. Dr Lopez-Ayala has received research grants from the Swiss Heart Foundation (FF20079 and FF21103) and speaker honoraria from Quidel, paid to the institution, outside the submitted work. Dr Nestelberger has received research support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (P400PM_191037/1), the Prof Dr Max Cloëtta Foundation, the Margarete und Walter Lichtenstein-Stiftung (3MS1038), and the University of Basel, the University Hospital Basel, as well as speaker/consulting honoraria or research support from Edwards Lifesciences, Pronova Medical, Meril, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Bayer, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, and Orion Pharma, outside the submitted work. Dr Boeddinghaus is supported by an Edinburgh Doctoral College Scholarship and received research grants from the University of Basel, the University Hospital of Basel, the Division of Internal Medicine, the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences, the Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, and the “Freie Akademische Gesellschaft Basel”; honoraria from Siemens Healthineers, Roche Diagnostics, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Quidel Corporation, and Beckman Coulter; and travel support from Medtronic and Cordis, all outside the submitted work. Dr Koechlin has received a research grant from the University of Basel, the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences, and the Gottfried and Julia Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation, as well as the “Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel,” and speaker honoraria from Roche Diagnostics, Abbott, and Siemens, outside the submitted work. Dr Martin-Sanchez has received speaker, advisory, or consulting fees from Novartis, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, The Medicine Company, Otsuka, Thermo Fisher, Cardiorentis, and Sanofi and research grants from the Spanish Ministry of Health and FEDER, Mapfre, Novartis, Bayer, MSD, Abbott, and Orion-Pharma, outside the submitted work. Dr Mueller has received research support from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the University Hospital Basel, the University of Basel, Abbott, Beckman Coulter, Brahms, Idorsia, LSI-Medience, Novartis, Ortho Clinical, Quidel, Roche, Siemens, Singulex, SpinChip, Upstream, and Sphingotec, as well as speaker honoraria/consulting honoraria from Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Osler, Novartis, Roche, Siemens, SpinChip, and Singulex, outside the submitted work, all paid to the institution. Dr Wildi reports funding from the University of Basel, the Swiss National Foundation (320030-231521), the Wesley Medical Research Foundation, and the University of Queensland, all outside submitted work. Dr Morello received grants from the University of Torino. Dr Lupia received grant support from Università degli Studi di Torino and Fondazione Ricerca Molinette. All other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with this study. The investigated hs-cTn assay was donated by the manufacturer, who had no role in the design of the study, the analysis of the data, the preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors designed the study, gathered and analyzed the data, vouch for the data and analysis, wrote the paper, and decided to publish. Drs Bima, Lopez-Ayala, Wildi, Nestelberger, Boeddinghaus, and Mueller had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors have read and approved the manuscript. The sponsors had no role in designing or conducting the study and no role in gathering or analyzing the data or writing the manuscript. The manuscript and its contents have not been published previously and are not being considered for publications elsewhere in whole or in part in any language, including publicly accessible web sites or e-print servers.
Figures
References
-
- Dagenais G.R., Leong D.P., Rangarajan S., et al. Variations in common diseases, hospital admissions, and deaths in middle-aged adults in 21 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:785–794. - PubMed
-
- Gevaert S.A., Halvorsen S., Sinnaeve P.R., et al. Evaluation and management of cancer patients presenting with acute cardiovascular disease: a Consensus Document of the Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC) association and the ESC council of Cardio-Oncology-Part 1: acute coronary syndromes and acute pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021;10:947–959. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
