Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 22;7(Suppl 6):e018176.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-018176.

Making health insurance responsive to citizens: learning from six low-income and middle-income countries

Affiliations
Review

Making health insurance responsive to citizens: learning from six low-income and middle-income countries

Anas Ismail et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

Background: Many low-income and middle-income countries have introduced public health insurance systems, whereby, thanks to government subsidies, selected groups are entitled to receive insurance coverage even if not paying direct contributions into the system. These efforts towards achieving universal health coverage were often undermined by difficulties in enrolment and registration, barriers to health service utilisation or complicated rules around service packages. Governmental and non-governmental accountability initiatives have been established to overcome these barriers in order to make health insurance programmes responsive and to empower citizens. This paper examines evidence and synthesizes lessons from 20 accountability initiatives in six selected countries to understand how these achieved (or not) these goals.

Methods: We systematically analysed six final reports and five published papers which were part of a multicountry research programme from 2019 to end of 2022 studying accountability initiatives. Between June 2023 and September 2024, we systematically extracted data and synthesised findings from the reports and papers based on a conceptual framework, adapted from a framework developed by Molyneux, which had been adopted by the country teams to guide their studies. We coded the extracted data and identified the content, context and process factors that enabled or hindered the accountability initiatives in achieving their intended goals. We present and discuss factors that were present in at least two initiatives.

Results: Governmental initiatives were in most instances established in conjunction with the health reforms that introduced the health insurance programmes they address. Whereas some of these initiatives were effective, many were undermined by poor outreach to citizens, inadequacy of resources, conflicts of interest and power imbalances and lack of fidelity to original design. Non-governmental initiatives often emerged to fill existing gaps in government services and programmes. Many of the non-governmental initiatives had several features which helped them in contributing to citizen empowerment, and these included embeddedness in and being trusted by the local communities, flexibility in operating and reaching out to people and the underlying motivation of people working in them.

Conclusions: The effective implementation of accountability initiatives requires transparency, trust-building measures, active outreach and community engagement and adequate resources. These elements can ensure that initiatives achieve their intended goal of enhancing citizens' access to their health insurance entitlements. Further research is needed to understand how best collaboration between governmental and non-governmental initiatives can be fostered to build synergies between the two toward the achievement of common goals.

Keywords: Health Services Accessibility; Health insurance; Health systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic of how accountability initiatives can contribute to UHC goals and health system objectives. UHC, universal health coverage.
Figure 2
Figure 2. A common research framework adopted by the country team to inform their data collection and analysis.

References

    1. Frenk J, González-Pier E, Gómez-Dantés O, et al. Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico. Lancet. 2006;368:1524–34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69564-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shroff ZC, Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Agenda Setting and Policy Adoption of India’s National Health Insurance Scheme: Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. Health Syst Reform . 2015;1:107–18. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2015.1034310. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathauer I, Theisling M, Mathivet B, et al. State budget transfers to health insurance funds: extending universal health coverage in low- and middle-income countries of the WHO European Region. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:57. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0321-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vilcu I, Mathauer I. State budget transfers to Health Insurance Funds for universal health coverage: institutional design patterns and challenges of covering those outside the formal sector in Eastern European high-income countries. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0295-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vilcu I, Probst L, Dorjsuren B, et al. Subsidized health insurance coverage of people in the informal sector and vulnerable population groups: trends in institutional design in Asia. Int J Equity Health. 2016;15:165. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0436-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources