Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May;22(5S):S359-S371.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.016.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Ovarian Cancer Screening: 2024 Update

Affiliations
Review

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Ovarian Cancer Screening: 2024 Update

Expert Panel on GYN and OB Imaging et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 May.

Abstract

Ovarian cancer remains low in prevalence but has the highest mortality of all gynecologic malignancies. Population-based screening for ovarian cancer remains a topic of interest in contemporary practice, given that the majority of cancers encountered are high-grade aggressive malignancies, for which favorable survival is encountered in the setting of early-stage disease. This document summarizes a review of the available data from randomized and observational trials that have evaluated the role of imaging for ovarian cancer screening in average-risk and high-risk patients. When considering screening using pelvic ultrasound in average-risk patients, we found insufficient published evidence to recommend ovarian cancer screening. Randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated a mortality benefit in this setting. Screening with pelvic ultrasound may be appropriate for select patients at high risk, although the existing data remain limited as large, randomized trials have not been performed in this setting. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Keywords: AUC; Appropriateness Criteria; appropriate use criteria; gynecology; imaging; ovarian cancer; radiology; screening; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Ovarian Cancer Screening.
    Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging:; Pandharipande PV, Lowry KP, Reinhold C, Atri M, Benson CB, Bhosale PR, Green ED, Kang SK, Lakhman Y, Maturen KE, Nicola R, Salazar GM, Shipp TD, Simpson L, Sussman BL, Uyeda J, Wall DJ, Whitcomb B, Zelop CM, Glanc P. Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging:, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11S):S490-S499. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.049. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017. PMID: 29101987
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Colorectal Cancer Screening: 2024 Update.
    Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging; Thomas DE, Horvat N, Fowler KJ, Birkholz JH, Cash BD, Dane B, Dbouk RH, Hanna N, Hurley J, Korngold EK, Pietryga JA, Yeghiayan P, Zell JA, Zreloff J, Kim DH. Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 May;22(5S):S190-S201. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.032. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40409877
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Based on Breast Density: 2024 Update.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Paulis LV, Lewin AA, Weinstein SP, Baron P, Dayaratna S, Dodelzon K, Dogan BE, Gulati A, Kantor O, Kasales C, Kunjummen JM, Kuzmiak CM, Newell MS, Salkowski LR, Sharpe RE Jr, Small W Jr, Ulaner GA, Slanetz PJ. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025 May;22(5S):S405-S423. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.023. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40409891
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Palpable Breast Masses: 2022 Update.
    Expert Panel on Breast Imaging; Klein KA, Kocher M, Lourenco AP, Niell BL, Bennett DL, Chetlen A, Freer P, Ivansco LK, Jochelson MS, Kremer ME, Malak SF, McCrary M, Mehta TS, Neal CH, Porpiglia A, Ulaner GA, Moy L. Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 May;20(5S):S146-S163. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.013. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37236740 Review.
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Routine Chest Imaging.
    Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging; Bang TJ, Chung JH, Walker CM, Brixey AG, Christensen JD, Faiz SA, Hanak M, Hobbs SB, Kandathil A, Little BP, Madan R, Moore WH, Richman IB, Setters B, Todd MJ, Yang SC, Donnelly EF. Expert Panel on Thoracic Imaging, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 May;20(5S):S224-S233. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.006. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37236745 Review.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources