Extracellular Vesicle Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein as a Circulating Biomarker of Traumatic Brain Injury Severity
- PMID: 40410624
- PMCID: PMC12102119
- DOI: 10.1007/s12031-025-02360-5
Extracellular Vesicle Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein as a Circulating Biomarker of Traumatic Brain Injury Severity
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a major global health challenge with a need for improved diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This study aimed to evaluate the biomarker potential of extracellular vesicle (EV)-encapsulated glial fibrillary acidic protein (EV-GFAP), neurofilament light chain (EV-NfL), total tau (EV-T-Tau), and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (EV-UCH-L1) in TBI. A cohort of 93 trauma patients (75 with TBI and 18 without TBI) was analyzed. Patients were sampled on admission, as well as 15 and 72 h post-injury. Following initial method validation, EVs were isolated from plasma using size exclusion chromatography (SEC), and plasma levels and EV cargo levels of biomarkers were measured using an ultra-sensitive Single Molecule Array. EV-GFAP levels were significantly elevated in TBI patients compared to non-TBI trauma patients at admission and 15 h. A positive head CT was associated with 2.85 (95% CI: 1.18-6.91) fold increased EV-GFAP, whereas EV-NfL, EV-T-Tau, and EV-UCH-L1 levels were not affected. None of the tested EV biomarkers were associated with 1-year mortality or 6-12 months' functional outcome. Plasma-GFAP levels increased 3.4 (95% CI: 1.72-6.70) fold with a positive head CT but were not associated with outcomes. EV-GFAP shows potential as an early biomarker of TBI, but plasma-GFAP remains a practical and reliable alternative. Future studies should explore the potential complementary roles of EV-based biomarkers on alternative aspects of TBI pathophysiology and prediction of long-term outcomes. Studies should refine methods to enhance reproducibility and clinical applicability.
Keywords: Biomarkers; Extracellular vesicle; Glial fibrillary acidic protein; Traumatic brain injury.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical Approval and Consent Process: The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and received approval from the local ethical committee (1–10-72–205-16 and 1–10-72–204-16) and the Danish Data Protection Authority (1–16-02–452-16). All patients or a representative (guardian or nearest relative and trial guardian) provided written informed consent to participate as soon as possible after inclusion. Competing interest: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Abdelhak A et al (2022) Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders. Nat Rev Neurol 18(3):158–172 - PubMed
-
- Bartko EA et al (2024) MMP9 and CCL18 associate with chronic urticaria while type I, IV, and VI collagens change with omalizumab treatment. Allergy 79(9):2558–2561 - PubMed
-
- Bazarian JJ et al (2018) Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study. Lancet Neurol 17(9):782–789 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
