Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 May 24;20(1):506.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05884-z.

A protocol for randomized controlled trial on early active flexion versus passive flexion mobilization therapy for Spaghetti wrist injuries

Kishore Vellingiri  1 , Ashwath M Acharya  2 , Anil K Bhat  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A protocol for randomized controlled trial on early active flexion versus passive flexion mobilization therapy for Spaghetti wrist injuries

Kishore Vellingiri et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Spaghetti-wrist injuries representing Zone-5 flexor tendon lacerations remain a major challenge for hand surgeons despite the use of careful and meticulous surgical techniques and appropriate rehabilitation programs. Injuries in these regions can lead to adhesion formation, stiffness, and loss of hand function in view of its delicate and complex anatomy. One of the methods to prevent adhesion is the use of active flexion rehabilitation protocols. Its benefits have been shown in numerous reports on zone-2 injuries. However, there is a paucity of reports for this regime in Zone-5 and Spaghetti-wrist injuries.

Methods: This study proposes a double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the functional results of two rehabilitation methods following the repair of Spaghetti-wrist injuries. This includes the passive or active flexion therapy regime performed over six weeks. After fulfilling the inclusion criteria, adults aged 18-60 who have presented with spaghetti-wrist injuries will be selected. Patients will receive a comprehensive document outlining the study's purpose, methodology, and follow-up schedule, which will be a part of the informed consent. 44 patients will be immobilized in a plaster slab and assigned equally to the passive or active flexion group. They will be assessed for primary and secondary outcomes, which include Tang's criteria, independent digital function, sensory assessment, pinch and grip strength, and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MCHQ), each at six and 12 weeks, six and 12 months. The study will follow the SPIRIT guidelines.

Discussion: The proposed RCT compares early active and passive flexion regimes' functional results in zone-5 flexor tendon injuries. This trial is unique as an active flexion regime was not described earlier in a major comparison study. It will answer the role and possible benefits of a more aggressive early active flexion program. Additionally, the study will give information on patient-reported outcomes and address the incidence of complications in a much longer follow-up of one year.

Trial registration details: The institute ethics committee approval was confirmed for the study (approval No. IEC - 383/2022), and registration for the Clinical Trial Registry of India was completed (CTRI/2023/03/050721).

Keywords: Flexor tendon injury; Flexor tendon rehabilitation; Spaghetti wrist injury; Zone-5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: Institute Ethics Committee approved for this trial study (IEC − 383/2022). Clinical Trial Registry of India registration has been done (No. CTRI/2023/03/050721). Consent to participate: Written informed consent was taken from the participants for this trial. Consent to publish: The publication does not have any images or data disclosing the identity or information of any patient participating in the study. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Shows the flow chart for the randomized control trial program. TAM– Total Active movement, FDS– flexor digitorum superficialis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bal S, Oz B, Gurgan A, Memis A, Demirdover C, Sahin B, Oztan Y. Anatomic and functional improvements achieved by rehabilitation in zone II and zone V flexor tendon injuries. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90(1):17–24. 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181fc7a46. - PubMed
    1. Aletto C, Aicale R, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Hand flexor tendon repair: from biology to surgery and rehabilitation. Hand Clin. 2023;39(2):215–25. 10.1016/j.hcl.2022.12.001. - PubMed
    1. Koshy K, Prakash R, Luckiewicz A, Alamouti R, Nikkhah D. An extensive volar forearm Laceration - The spaghetti wrist: A systematic review. JPRAS Open. 2018;18:1–17. 10.1016/j.jpra.2018.06.003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panchal J, Mehdi S, O’Donoghue JM, O’Sullivan ST, O’Shaughnessy M, O’Connor TP. The range of excursion of flexor tendons in zone V: a comparison of active vs passive flexion mobilisation regimes. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(7):517–22. 10.1016/s0007-1226(97)91300-x. - PubMed
    1. Tang JB. Rehabilitation after flexor tendon repair and others: a safe and efficient protocol. J Hand Surg (European Volume). 2021;46(8):813–17. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources