Hip osteoarthritis is associated with higher revision rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
- PMID: 40411537
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08943-5
Hip osteoarthritis is associated with higher revision rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with concurrent hip osteoarthritis (OA) and lumbar spinal pathologies often present with more disability and worse baseline measures of pain and function compared to patients with only spinal disease. However, the impact of hip OA on outcomes following specific spinal fusion techniques, such as transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), is not well established.
Methods: Patients with and without hip OA who underwent TLIF at a single academic institution were identified. Patients with total hip arthroplasty were excluded. Baseline demographics, one-year postoperative surgical complications, and preoperative to one-year postoperative change in PROMs were compared. Multivariate regression analysis, accounting for age, sex, and CCI, were performed to evaluate outcomes in hip OA patients.
Results: Among the 234 included patients, 117 had hip OA and 117 did not. The mean age was 63.7 years, 54.3% were females, the mean CCI was 3.2, and the mean follow-up was 30.6 months. Hip OA patients had a higher revision fusion rate compared to non-hip OA patients (19.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.002), with 4.18 times higher odds of revision (95% CI = 1.63-10.70, p = 0.003). At one year postoperatively, patients with hip OA had significantly worse VAS Leg scores (5.04 vs. 3.95, p = 0.005) and demonstrated less improvement in VAS Leg (- 1.61 vs. -2.81, p = 0.008) than non-hip OA patients. Other PROMs did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusions: This investigation revealed that patients with hip OA undergoing TLIF have higher revision rates and worse VAS leg pain compared to those without hip OA. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive evaluation and multidisciplinary care of hip and spine disorders in patients undergoing spine surgery, which can guide surgical decision making and patient counselling, with potential to improve postoperative outcomes.
Keywords: Complications; Hip osteoarthritis; Patient-reported outcome measures; Revision; Spinopelvic alignment; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spinal Pathology: Clinical Outcome Comparison in Patients With Predominant Back Pain.Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Dec 1;37(10):E441-E447. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001631. Epub 2024 Oct 25. Clin Spine Surg. 2024. PMID: 39450893
-
Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease.Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1960-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Jul 26. Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31356987
-
Revision lumbar fusions have higher rates of reoperation and result in worse clinical outcomes compared to primary lumbar fusions.Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Sep 2. Spine J. 2023. PMID: 36064090
-
Practical answers to frequently asked questions in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery.Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.087. Epub 2022 Jul 15. Spine J. 2023. PMID: 35843537 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature.World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e251-e267. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.136. Epub 2022 Aug 7. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35948231 Review.
References
-
- Diebo BG, Alsoof D, Balmaceno-Criss M et al (2024) Hip osteoarthritis in patients undergoing surgery for severe adult spinal deformity: prevalence and impact on spine surgery outcomes. JBJS 106(13):1171. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.23.00818 - DOI
-
- Lee BH, Moon SH, Lee HM, Kim TH, Lee SJ (2012) Prevalence of hip pathology in patients over age 50 with spinal conditions requiring surgery. Indian J Orthop 46(3):291–296. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.96386 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Goode AP, Cleveland RJ, George SZ et al (2020) Different phenotypes of osteoarthritis in the lumbar spine reflected by demographic and clinical characteristics: the Johnston County osteoarthritis project. Arthritis Care Res 72(7):974–981. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23918 - DOI
-
- Liu N, Goodman SB, Lachiewicz PF, Wood KB (2019) Hip or spine surgery first? A survey of treatment order for patients with concurrent degenerative hip and spinal disorders. Bone Jt J 101–B(6SuppleB):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1073.R1 - DOI
-
- Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Alsoof D et al (2024) Impact of hip and knee osteoarthritis on full body sagittal alignment and compensation for sagittal spinal deformity. Spine. Published online February 20. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004957
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources