A Clinical Pharmacological Perspective on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- PMID: 40411722
- PMCID: PMC12185600
- DOI: 10.1007/s40265-025-02195-9
A Clinical Pharmacological Perspective on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM), frequently observed in malignancies such as ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, and gastric cancers, present a significant therapeutic challenge due to poor prognosis and limited effectiveness to systemic chemotherapy. The peritoneal-plasma barrier reduces effective drug transfer from plasma to the peritoneal cavity, reducing cytotoxic effects on PM. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy offers a locoregional approach, enabling high local drug concentrations that can enhance therapeutic efficacy while limiting systemic toxicity. The three major methods for IP administration-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), and catheter-based IP (CBIP) chemotherapy-each provide unique pharmacokinetic (PK) advantages for PM treatment. This review provides a comprehensive update on the pharmacological rationale of IP chemotherapy, focusing on drug characteristics that support extended IP retention and effective tumor targeting. The effects of administration variables are discussed, highlighting their role in optimizing IP drug exposure. Additionally, recent PK data on commonly used drugs in IP therapy, including platinum-based agents, taxanes, and novel nanoparticle formulations, will be evaluated. While PK rationale supports the administration of IP chemotherapy, further efficacy results from ongoing clinical trials are still awaited. Innovations in nanoparticle-based formulations and controlled-release systems offer substantial potential for improving both drug retention and targeted delivery, enhancing treatment precision and minimizing systemic toxicity. Continued exploration in these areas, along with optimization of IP administration protocols, is vital for advancing patient outcomes, refining therapeutic strategies, and maximizing the benefits of IP chemotherapy in clinical practice.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: No external funding was used in the preparation of this manuscript. Conflict of Interest: Pascale C.S. Rietveld, Niels A.D. Guchelaar, Sebastiaan D.T. Sassen, Birgit C.P. Koch, Ron H.J. Mathijssen, and Stijn L.W. Koolen declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Consent to Participate: Not applicable. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material: Not applicable. Code Availability: Not applicable. Author Contributions: Pascale C.S. Rietveld: conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, and visualization. Niels A.D. Guchelaar: investigation and writing—review and editing. Sebastiaan D.T. Sassen: supervision and writing—review and editing. Birgit C.P. Koch: supervision and writing—review and editing. Ron H.J. Mathijssen: writing—review and editing and supervision. Stijn L.W. Koolen: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review and editing, and supervision.
Figures



Similar articles
-
A Feasibility Study of Mass-Based Response Drug Screening to Guide Personalized Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Appendiceal and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma with Peritoneal Metastasis.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;32(8):5784-5794. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17517-0. Epub 2025 May 30. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40445508
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16545208
-
A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in ovarian cancer.Acta Oncol. 2001;40(2-3):340-60. doi: 10.1080/02841860151116420. Acta Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11441940
References
-
- Rijken A, van Erning FN, Rovers KP, Lemmens V, de Hingh I. On the origin of peritoneal metastases. Eur J Cancer. 2023;181:1–2. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA, Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(1):34–43. 10.1056/NEJMoa052985. (PMID: 16394300). - PubMed
-
- van Eerden RAG, de Boer NL, van Kooten JP, Bakkers C, Dietz MV, Creemers GM, et al. Phase I study of intraperitoneal irinotecan combined with palliative systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. Br J Surg. 2023;110(11):1502–10. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical