Heart substructure exposure during left breast cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric comparison between hybrid VMAT and 3DCRT in free breathing and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH)
- PMID: 40413717
- DOI: 10.1007/s12094-025-03943-9
Heart substructure exposure during left breast cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric comparison between hybrid VMAT and 3DCRT in free breathing and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH)
Abstract
Background and purpose: Radiotherapy plays a pivotal role in breast cancer treatment. Incidental irradiation of the heart can cause cardiac toxicity. We conducted a dosimetric comparison between Hybrid VMAT (H-VMAT) and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) in both Free Breathing (FB) and Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) techniques for left-sided breast cancer patients.
Materials and methods: Thirty-seven patients underwent CT scans in both FB and DIBH positions. Heart substructures were delineated following established guidelines. Subsequently, 3DCRT and H-VMAT plans were generated for each patient in both breath techniques. The dosimetric parameters of heart and its cavities were analysed: Dmean(Gy) and V5Gy(%) for heart substructures, Dmean(Gy), V25Gy(%) and V30Gy(cm3) for heart and D98%(%), D2%(%), D50%(%) and V95%(%) or V90%(%) for PTVs. Statistical analyses were performed.
Results: The analysis revealed statistically significant differences for the heart, and its cavities. The 3DCRT plans generated in DIBH offered a statistically significant lower dose for the heart and its substructures compared to the other techniques. When comparing PTV dosimetry, the H-VMAT plans showed an increase D98%(%) and a decrease D2%(%) relative to the 3DCRT plans, for both breathing techniques employed.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates significant differences in the dosimetric outcomes for the heart substructures among the four evaluated techniques, with 3DCRT in DIBH yielding the lowest parameters for most substructures. Although H-VMAT provided superior target coverage, it resulted in greater low doses incidental exposure of the heart substructures. Notably, 3DCRT plans in the DIBH setting exhibited lower doses compared to H-VMAT in FB, supporting its preferential use for minimising cardiac exposure.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cavities; Dosimetry; Heart; Hybrid VMAT; Radiotherapy.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).
Conflict of interest statement
Decalaration. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there are no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest related to the work presented. Consent to participate: The research involved human participants, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
References
-
- Meattini I, Becherini C, Caini S, Coles CE, Cortes J, Curigliano G, et al. International multidisciplinary consensus on the integration of radiotherapy with new systemic treatments for breast cancer: European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-endorsed recommendations. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(2):e73-83. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials. Lancet 2011;378(9804):1707–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61629-2
-
- Taylor CW, Kirby AM. Cardiac side-effects from breast cancer radiotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2015;27(11):621–9. - DOI
-
- Bartlett FR, Yarnold JR, Kirby AM. Breast radiotherapy and heart disease d where are we now? Clin Oncol. 2013;25:687–9. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
