Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;22(6):e70682.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.70682.

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Attitude Scale for Pressure Injury Prevention Among Clinical Nurses

Affiliations

Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Attitude Scale for Pressure Injury Prevention Among Clinical Nurses

Yu-Lin Wu et al. Int Wound J. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

To translate and validate psychometric analyses across different cultures. Pressure injuries are a concern in healthcare. Negative attitudes hamper prevention efforts, yet Taiwan lacks a reliable assessment tool. Translate the Pressure Injury Prevention Attitude Scale, originally developed by Moore and Price, into the Taiwanese version, verify the psychometric analysis, and evaluate clinical nurses' attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. Brislin's forward and backward translation, along with verification processes, were employed to ensure that the translated Taiwanese version is culturally and linguistically appropriate for Taiwan. Content validity was evaluated by a panel of seven experts specializing in pressure injury. Confirmatory factor analysis affirmed the validity of both positive and negative measures within the attitude scale items. A sample of 330 nurses from a regional teaching hospital participated in assessing the instrument's construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Data collection occurred between April and May 2021. The Attitudes Toward Pressure Injury Prevention-Taiwanese Version exhibited robust psychometric properties, demonstrating high item-level content validity and internal consistency as indicated by Cronbach's α. Additionally, it showed impressive test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis identified two distinct factors, reflecting positive and negative attitudes. The Attitudes Toward Pressure Injury Prevention Scale-Taiwanese Version effectively assesses nurses' attitudes towards PI prevention in Taiwan. It also informs future research on the relationship between attitudes, knowledge and clinical performance. The Attitudes Toward Pressure Injury Prevention-Taiwanese Version serves as a valuable tool for assessing nurses' attitudes in Taiwan, enhancing preventive measures and patient care. Managers and educators can utilize attitude measures on pressure injury prevention to shape training strategies.

Keywords: attitude; cross culture; nurse; pressure injury; prevention; psychometric properties; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Step for translation and validation of the attitudes toward pressure injury prevention. aT‐APIPS, Taiwanese version of the Attitude toward the Pressure Injury Prevention Scale; I‐CVI, Item‐level Content Validity Index; S‐CVI/UA, Scale‐Level Content Validity Index/Universal Agreement; S‐CVI/Ave, Scale‐Level Content Validity Index/Average.

Similar articles

References

    1. Tervo‐Heikkinen T. A., Heikkilä A., Koivunen M., et al., “Pressure Injury Prevalence and Incidence in Acute Inpatient Care and Related Risk Factors: A Cross‐Sectional National Study,” International Wound Journal 19, no. 4 (2022): 919–931, 10.1111/iwj.13692. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cox J., Edsberg L. E., Koloms K., and VanGilder C. A., “Pressure Injuries in Critical Care Patients in US Hospitals: Results of the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey,” Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing 49, no. 1 (2022): 21–28, 10.1097/won.0000000000000834. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gefen A., Kolsi J., King T., Grainger S., and Burns M., “Modelling the Cost‐Benefits Arising From Technology‐Aided Early Detection of Pressure Ulcers,” Wounds International 11, no. 1 (2020): 12–17.
    1. Graves N., Phillips C., and Harding K., “A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology and Economics of Chronic Wounds,” British Journal of Dermatology 187, no. 2 (2022): 141–148. - PubMed
    1. Heikkilä A., Kotila J., and Junttila K., “Validation of the Helsinki University Hospital Prevent Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Tool: A Prospective Observational Study,” BMC Nursing 21, no. 1 (2022): 18. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types