Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May;17(3):288-303.
doi: 10.4168/aair.2025.17.3.288.

Global Perspectives on Allergen Labeling: Harmonization of Regulations and Practices

Affiliations
Review

Global Perspectives on Allergen Labeling: Harmonization of Regulations and Practices

Jun-Hyeok Ham et al. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2025 May.

Abstract

The prevention of allergic reactions relies on avoiding allergenic foods making it crucial to accurately label products and provide clear information to customers. The "Big Eight" allergenic foods (milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish, fish, soybeans, and wheat) recommended by the Codex Alimentarius form the basis of the global allergy labeling system. Nevertheless, countries worldwide have developed their own labeling systems tailored to their unique dietary habits and allergy prevalence. With the increase in global food trade and allergy rates, inconsistent international food allergy labeling can jeopardize consumer safety and confuse manufacturers. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the Big Eight allergenic foods and a comparative analysis of allergen labeling regulations across various global regions. It highlights the need for internationally consistent labeling standards, and harmonized approaches for precautionary allergen labeling as well as emphasizes global efforts to enhance the identification of allergenic foods. Furthermore, this review aims to enhance global food safety management, promote international cooperation, and help consumers make informed food choices.

Keywords: Food allergy; allergen labelling, cross reactivity; allergen regulation; food labeling; management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no financial or other issues that might lead to conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure
Figure. Global comparison of PAL regulations.
Most countries do not have specific regulations for PAL. However, Switzerland, South Africa, Argentina, and Brazil only allow PAL if there is scientific evidence of cross-contamination. In Japan, PAL is prohibited by law, and allergenic foods that exceed 10 ppm must be labeled, regardless of intent. Although voluntary threshold labeling is not legally mandated in Australia and New Zealand, it is recommended. Notably, South Korea is the only country where PAL is mandated by law. PAL, precautionary allergen labeling.

References

    1. Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, Wood RA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:S1–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elghoudi A, Narchi H. Food allergy in children-the current status and the way forward. World J Clin Pediatr. 2022;11:253–269. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Warren C, Nimmagadda SR, Gupta R, Levin M. The epidemiology of food allergy in adults. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023;130:276–287. - PubMed
    1. Li J, Ogorodova LM, Mahesh PA, Wang MH, Fedorova OS, Leung TF, et al. Comparative study of food allergies in children from China, India, and Russia: the EuroPrevall-INCO surveys. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8:1349–1358.e16. - PubMed
    1. Allen KJ, Turner PJ, Pawankar R, Taylor S, Sicherer S, Lack G, et al. Precautionary labelling of foods for allergen content: are we ready for a global framework? World Allergy Organ J. 2014;7:10. - PMC - PubMed