Testing certain and uncertain incentives on study retention in a longitudinal social media survey among young adults: An embedded recruitment trial
- PMID: 40416076
- PMCID: PMC12099130
- DOI: 10.1177/20552076251336522
Testing certain and uncertain incentives on study retention in a longitudinal social media survey among young adults: An embedded recruitment trial
Abstract
Introduction: Incentives can be effective in survey research but evidence is limited on how incentive type impacts survey retention in longitudinal social media-based surveys. This study examined how certain and uncertain incentives affect study retention among US young adults recruited online and whether incentive effects vary by sociodemographic factors.
Methods: Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to a three-arm parallel trial (n = 1615) with (1) a lottery for a $200 gift card (uncertain), (2) a cash equivalent (CE) of a $5 gift card per survey (certain); or (3) a combination of both options (combined), and were surveyed at baseline, 30 days, and 60 days. This study focused on survey retention at 30 days (among baseline completers, n = 1491) and 60 days (among 30-day completers, n = 1018). Participants were not blinded to their condition but were blinded to other conditions and researchers were blinded until data collection was complete. Logistic regressions examined survey retention as a function of incentive condition and sociodemographics, with additional analyses of interaction effects. We report average marginal effects (AMEs) with significance defined as p < 0.05.
Results: The certain CE was effective for survey retention versus the lottery at 30-day follow-up only (43.8% [lottery] vs. 77.7% [CE], AME: 0.346, p < 0.000); there were no differences between CE versus lottery at 60-day follow-up (76.1% [lottery] and 81.3% [CE], AME: 0.054, p = 0.192). The combined incentive demonstrated significantly higher retention at both follow-ups versus the lottery but no significant advantage over the CE. Incentive effectiveness showed minimal variation across sociodemographic factors.
Discussion: This study is among the few to experimentally test incentives for retention in online social-media based research. A certain CE was most effective for short-term web survey retention among young adults compared with a lottery. Findings suggest that small guaranteed rewards may better motivate study retention than uncertain larger amounts.
Keywords: Incentives; behavioral economics; e-cigarettes; prospect theory; retention; social media studies; young adults.
© The Author(s) 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of response to incentive recruitment strategies in a social media-based survey.Digit Health. 2023 Jun 4;9:20552076231178430. doi: 10.1177/20552076231178430. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2023. PMID: 37312941 Free PMC article.
-
Recruiting and Retaining Youth and Young Adults in the Policy and Communication Evaluation (PACE) Vermont Study: Randomized Controlled Trial of Participant Compensation.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e18446. doi: 10.2196/18446. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32706681 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Impact of Incentives on Data Collection for Online Surveys: Social Media Recruitment Study.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 4;8:e50240. doi: 10.2196/50240. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 38963924 Free PMC article.
-
Incentives in Diabetic Eye Assessment by Screening (IDEAS) trial: a three-armed randomised controlled trial of financial incentives.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Mar. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Mar. PMID: 28375591 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Laurie H, Lynn P. The use of respondent incentives on longitudinal surveys. Report for the Institute for Social and Economic Research, Report No. 2008-42, University of Essex, Essex, UK, December 2008.
-
- Nicolaas G, Corteen E, Davies B. The use of incentives to recruit and retain hard-to-get populations in longitudinal studies, https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ESRC-220311-NatCen-UseOf... (May 31, 2019, 3 November 2023).
-
- Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, et al. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child 2008; 93: 458–461. - PubMed
-
- Göritz A. Cash lotteries as incentives in online panels. Soc Sci Comput Rev 2006; 24: 445–459.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources