Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 9:13:1509595.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1509595. eCollection 2025.

Occupational health risk perceptions and determinants: knowledge and attitude of sanitary workers in public hospitals of Ethiopia

Affiliations

Occupational health risk perceptions and determinants: knowledge and attitude of sanitary workers in public hospitals of Ethiopia

Sina Temesgen Tolera et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Occupational health risks (OHRs) perception refer to an individual's subjective assessment of the likelihood and severity of potential health hazards within their workplace, which are influenced by their knowledge and attitude. The OHRs perceptions of sanitary workers (SWs) in Ethiopia have not yet been well studied. Therefore, this study aims to assess the knowledge and attitude of SWs about OHR perceptions and their determinants in public hospitals of eastern Ethiopia.

Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 809 SWs, which comprised face-to-face interviews. Knowledge items were measured by [YES/NO] and then categorized as "good" if they scored 16-20 points; "fair" if 10-15 points; and "poor" if < 10 points. On the other hand, attitude items were measured on Likert scales [strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5)] and classified as level 1: unfavorable; level 2: neutral; and level 3: favorable. Stata 17MP version was used for data analysis. The univariate analysis was applied for frequency, prevalence, media, and mean. Multilevel ordinal logistic regression was conducted for the predictions. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to determine the correlations between level of knowledge of and attitude toward OHRs perceptions as well as with their predictors.

Result: This study found that the poor level of knowledge of and unfavorable attitude toward OHRs among SWs were 67.35 and 42.66%, respectively. The difference in knowledge of and attitude toward OHRs perceptions of SWs between hospitals was 19.34 and 39.55%, respectively. The final model showed that the variables trained on occupational health and safety [OHS] (AOR: 4.90; 3.10, 7.75), satisfied with job (AOR: 1.88; 1.10, 3.75), and satisfied with environment (AOR: 2.57; 1.09, 6.05) were significantly associated with higher knowledge levels about OHRs. However, SWs who were satisfied with environment (AOR: 2.67; 1.03, 6.92) and who follow good infection prevention and control (IPC) practice (AOR: 20.43; 15, 35.84) were significantly associated with a high level of attitude toward OHRs. SEM results showed that OHS training (β: 0.35; 0.27, 0.44) and compliance with IPC (β: 0.07; 0.02, 0.12), as well as compliance with personal protective equipment (β: 0.14; 0.04, 0.23), had a positive impact on the knowledge and attitude about OHRs.

Conclusion: This study concluded that the majority of SWs had inadequate knowledge about and negative attitude toward OHRs perceptions. The following variables played the most significant role in predicting the SWs' knowledge of and attitude toward OHRs: OHS training, job and environmental satisfaction, safety measures, and job stress, which could be considered for further interventions.

Keywords: attitude; determinants; knowledge; occupational health; risk; sanitary workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selected study areas of eastern Ethiopia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the sampling procedure of SWs in the selected public hospitals. HUCSH, Haramaya University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital; JGH, Jugola General Hospital; DRH, Dilchora Referral Hospital; SGH, Sabain General Hospital; JUSHRH, Jigjiga University Referral Hospital, KGH, Karamara General Hospital; BGH, Bisidimo General Hospital; CGH, Chiro General Hospital.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic showing significant independent variables for AOR of knowledge and attitude toward occupational health risk perceptions among SWs in public hospitals. IPC: Infection prevention and control; PPE: Personal protective equipment; SuscepAt: Susceptibility of attitude to risks; SevereAt: Severity of attitude to the risks; Envtalsat: Environmental satisfaction; SocialReg: Social recognition; Jobsat: job satisfaction; OHStrained: Occupaitonal and safety tranining.

Similar articles

References

    1. Priolo G, Vignoli M, Nielsen K. Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: a systematic literature review. Saf Sci. (2025) 186:106811. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106811 - DOI
    1. García-Mainar I, Montuenga VM. Risk self-perception and occupational accidents. J Saf Res. (2024) 88:135–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.11.001, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerger BD, Bernal A, Paustenbach DJ, Huntley-Fenner G. Halo and spillover effect illustrations for selected beneficial medical devices and drugs. BMC Public Health. (2016) 16:979. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3595-7, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang H, Luo P, Wu Y, Zeng X. Factors and optimizations of healthcare Workers' perception in alternative care facilities. Front Public Health. (2022) 10:891503. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.891503, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. US: Cambridge University Press; (2002). doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511808098 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources