Navigating Pregnancy Testing in Chronic Pain Management for Women of Reproductive Age
- PMID: 40417073
- PMCID: PMC12103869
- DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S510703
Navigating Pregnancy Testing in Chronic Pain Management for Women of Reproductive Age
Abstract
Background: Women of childbearing age often require a nuanced and individualized approach to chronic pain management, especially when pregnancy is a possibility. Interventional procedures involving ionizing radiation, such as fluoroscopy-guided injections, raise specific concerns for fetal safety, including risks of embryo death, congenital anomalies, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. Despite national recommendations from organizations like the American College of Radiology (ACR), implementation of pregnancy screening in the pain management context remains limited.
Methods: This review synthesizes current literature and practice guidelines to assess the gaps in pregnancy screening protocols within chronic pain management settings. It highlights challenges in evaluating pregnancy status before initiating pharmacologic or fluoroscopic procedures, and it examines both biological testing limitations and procedural risks.
Results: Fluoroscopically guided procedures may exceed the teratogenic radiation threshold of 50 mGy, underscoring the critical need for reliable pregnancy screening. While urine and serum hCG tests are widely used, both are susceptible to false negatives and positives due to timing, hormone variants, and analytical interferences. Integrating clinical evaluation with menstrual history, point-of-care testing, and serum confirmation may improve diagnostic accuracy and ensure greater protection for the fetus.
Conclusion and recommendations: To address safety concerns, this review proposes a structured pregnancy screening algorithm tailored for chronic pain practices. Key recommendations include: routine screening of all reproductive-age women prior to procedures involving radiation or teratogenic medications, use of serum hCG testing when uncertainty exists, optimizing radiation exposure strategies, and clear, informed consent processes outlining fetal risks. Adoption of these best practices may improve clinical consistency and enhance patient safety.
Keywords: chronic pain; interventions; medications; pregnancy; radiation.
© 2025 Tamura et al.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors except Dr. Naum Shaparin and Dr. Karina Gritsenko report no disclosures for this work. Dr. Naum Shaparin reports receiving research funding AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Averitas Pharma and Heron Therapeutics. Dr. Karina Gritsenko reports being a consultant for Pacira Biosciences and Grunenthal Pharmaceuticals.
Similar articles
-
Vesicoureteral Reflux.2024 Apr 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2024 Apr 30. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 33085409 Free Books & Documents.
-
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011. PMID: 21749752
-
Radiation Exposure In Pregnancy.2023 May 1. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. 2023 May 1. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan–. PMID: 31869154 Free Books & Documents.
-
Epidural Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines.Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(S1):S27-S208. Pain Physician. 2021. PMID: 33492918 Review.
-
Obstetrical complications associated with abnormal maternal serum markers analytes.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Oct;30(10):918-932. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32973-5. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008. PMID: 19038077 Review. English, French.
References
-
- Zakowski M. How I do it: managing an obstetric patient with chronic pain. ASRA News. 2021;46.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources