Orthogonal versus parallel plating in pediatric distal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 40418532
- DOI: 10.1007/s12306-025-00903-y
Orthogonal versus parallel plating in pediatric distal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared orthogonal and parallel plating techniques for these fractures, focusing on functional recovery, complication rates, and biomechanical stability.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on January 25, 2025, across PubMed, EMBASE, Europe PMC, and Scopus. Studies involving pediatric patients (aged 0-18 years) with distal humeral fractures treated using orthogonal or parallel plating were included. Eligible studies reported outcomes such as Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), union time, and non-union rate. Two independent reviewers extracted data, and study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB) tool version 2.0. Statistical analyses were performed using a random-effects model in RStudio.
Results: From an initial pool of 659 records, five studies (three randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and two cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses revealed no significant differences between orthogonal and parallel plating in MEPS (SMD - 0.25, p = 0.07), ROM (SMD - 0.15, p = 0.27), flexion range (SMD - 0.11, p = 0.46), non-union rate (RR 1.01, p = 0.99), union time (RR 1.01, p = 0.99), or surgical duration (SMD 0.06, p = 0.74). However, orthogonal plating showed a statistically significant advantage in extension range (SMD 0.45, p = 0.005). The risk of bias was minimal, and the certainty of evidence was rated as high.
Conclusions: Both orthogonal and parallel plating techniques demonstrated comparable efficacy in managing pediatric distal humeral fractures, with no significant differences in most outcomes. Orthogonal plating exhibited a slight advantage in extension range, though its clinical relevance requires further investigation.
Keywords: Biomechanics; Fixation; Fractures; Outcomes; Pediatrics.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes data from previously published studies and does not involve direct interaction with human or animal subjects, nor does it include primary data collection. As such, ethical approval from an institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee was not required.
References
-
- Hope N, Varacallo MA (2025) Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; [cited 2025 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560933/
-
- Olson JJ, Dyer GSM (2021) Skinny wire and locking plate fixation for comminuted intra-articular distal humerus fractures: a technical trick and case series. JSES Rev Reports Tech 1(1):34–40 - DOI
-
- Got C, Shuck J, Biercevicz A, Paller D, Mulcahey M, Zimmermann M et al (2012) Biomechanical comparison of parallel versus 90–90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures with intra-articular comminution. J Hand Surg 37(12):2512–2518 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous