Choosing Between HLA-Mismatched Unrelated and Haploidentical Donors: Donor Age Considerations
- PMID: 40419020
- PMCID: PMC12403200
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2025.05.019
Choosing Between HLA-Mismatched Unrelated and Haploidentical Donors: Donor Age Considerations
Abstract
Haploidentical donors and HLA-mismatched unrelated donors (MMUDs) are increasingly utilized for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) emerging as an effective graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis strategy. Despite the growing use of these donor types, comparative data to guide donor selection remain limited. Donor age is a known predictor of HCT outcomes, yet its specific impact when choosing between haploidentical and MMUD donors with PTCy-based prophylaxis has not been thoroughly explored. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of donor age on HCT outcomes in patients receiving haploidentical or MMUD HCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis, hypothesizing that younger donors (<30 years) would be associated with improved outcomes compared to older donors (≥30 years) regardless of donor type. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 7116 patients with hematologic malignancies from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, transplanted between 2013 and 2021. Donors were categorized into four groups: younger haploidentical (<30 years), older haploidentical (≥30 years), younger MMUD (<30 years), and older MMUD (≥30 years). The primary outcome was GVHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS), defined as the absence of grade III to IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy (IST), relapse, or death. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, treatment-related mortality (TRM), relapse, grade III to IV acute GVHD, overall chronic GVHD, and chronic GVHD requiring IST. Comparisons were made between (1) younger MMUD versus older haploidentical and (2) younger haploidentical versus older MMUD groups using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. In multivariable analysis, the older MMUD group exhibited inferior GRFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.36; P = .003), higher TRM (HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.96; P = .005), and increased grade III to IV acute GVHD (HR 2.88; 95% CI, 1.43 to 5.80; P = .003) compared to the younger haploidentical group. The younger MMUD group had modest GRFS improvement over the older haploidentical group (HR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; P = .02) and significantly reduced risks of grade II to IV acute GVHD (HR 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.88; P = .003) and chronic GVHD (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94; P = .009). Younger donor age is associated with superior HCT outcomes, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing donors aged <30 years regardless of donor type when feasible.
Keywords: Donor age; Haploidentical; MMUD; Mismatched unrelated donor; PTCy; Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide.
Copyright © 2025 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure Statement:
K.W. CIBMTR Advisory Board Member (uncompensated)
S.A.P. received research funding from the UMass Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) Pilot Project Program grant (NIH / NCATS Grant UL1TR001453) in 2022–23. Received an honoraria from Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning. Received travel support for the 2024 AAMDSIF Conference. Served on the Acute Myeloid Leukemia Advisory Board and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Advisory Board for Bristol Myers Squibb, the Acute Leukemia Advisory Board for Syndax, and the Multiple Myeloma Advisory Board for Pfizer.
B.C.B reports research support from CTI BioPharma Corp., a Sobi company, VITRAC Therapeutics, and Incyte. B.C.B. holds a patent (WO2015120436A2) related to CD4+ T cell pSTAT3 as a marker and therapeutic target of acute GVHD and a provisional patent (WO2017058950A1) related to the use of JAK inhibitors for rejection and GVHD prevention. B.C.B has a patent for WO2019165156 on CD83 CAR T, previously licensed to CRISPR Therapeutics.
S.J.L. has received consulting fees from Novartis, Sanofi and Incyte; research funding from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Sanofi and Syndax, and drug supply from Janssen. She is on clinical trial steering committees for Incyte and Sanofi. She is on the Board of Directors of the National Marrow Donor Program (uncompensated)
References
-
- Cusatis R, Litovich C, Feng Z, et al. Current Trends and Outcomes in Cellular Therapy Activity in the United States, Including Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes Data Collection in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Registry. Transplant Cell Ther Sep 2024;30(9):917 e1–917 e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.06.021 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Shaw BE, Jimenez-Jimenez AM, Burns LJ, et al. National Marrow Donor Program-Sponsored Multicenter, Phase II Trial of HLA-Mismatched Unrelated Donor Bone Marrow Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide. J Clin Oncol Jun 20 2021;39(18):1971–1982. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03502 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
