Feasibility and clinical potential of exercise interventions during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer
- PMID: 40419137
- PMCID: PMC12482329
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101060
Feasibility and clinical potential of exercise interventions during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Exercise during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has potential to mitigate treatment-related declines in physical fitness, and to improve clinical outcomes, including toxicity and tumor response. However, optimal frequency and timing of exercise remains to be determined. Therefore, this pilot trial aimed to assess feasibility of 2 different exercise interventions during NCRT in patients with esophageal and rectal cancer and to evaluate potential clinical effects.
Methods: Patients were randomized into 1 of 3 study arms during NCRT: (a) 30-min aerobic exercise in-hospital within 1 h prior to each radiotherapy fraction (ExPR), (b) two 60-min supervised combined aerobic and resistance exercise sessions per week (AE + RE), and (c) usual care (UC). Feasibility was assessed by examining participation rate and exercise adherence. Intervention effects on physical fitness, health-related quality of life, treatment-related toxicity, and tumor response in patients with esophageal cancer were explored using regression analyses and 85% confidence intervals (85%CIs).
Results: Thirty-seven patients with esophageal cancer (participation rate = 45%) and 2 patients with rectal cancer (participation rate = 14%) were included. Median session attendance was 98% (interquartile range (IQR): 96%-100%) in the ExPR and 78% (IQR: 33%-100%) in the AE + RE group. We found clinically relevant benefits of exercise on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max, mL/kg/min)(ExPR: β = 9.7, 85%CI: 6.9-12.6; AE + RE: β = 5.6, 85%CI: 2.6-8.5) and treatment-related toxicity (ExPR: β = -2.8, 85%CI: -5.4 to -0.2; AE + RE: β = -2.6, 85%CI: -5.3 to 0.0). Additionally, good tumor response was found in 70% in AE + RE and ExPR vs. 55% in UC (odds ratio (OR) = 1.9, 85%CI: 0.5-7.7).
Conclusion: Starting prehabilitation during NCRT is feasible, can increase starting fitness of traditional pre-surgical programs, and has potential to improve clinical outcomes.
Keywords: Aerobic capacity; Esophageal cancer; Exercise intervention; Treatment-related toxicity; Tumor response.
Copyright © 2025. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests The results of the study have been presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures




References
-
- Hughes M.J., Hackney R.J., Lamb P.J., Wigmore S.J., Christopher Deans D.A., Skipworth R.J.E. Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2019;43:1661–1668. - PubMed
-
- Ligibel J.A., Bohlke K., May A.M., et al. Exercise, diet, and weight management during cancer treatment: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:2491–2507. - PubMed
-
- Voorn M.J.J., Franssen R.F.W., Hoogeboom T.J., et al. Evidence base for exercise prehabilitation suggests favourable outcomes for patients undergoing surgery for non-small cell lung cancer despite being of low therapeutic quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023;49:879–894. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources