Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 May 26;27(1):113.
doi: 10.1186/s13075-025-03577-w.

Efficacy and safety of epaminurad, a potent hURAT1 inhibitor, in patients with gout: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy and safety of epaminurad, a potent hURAT1 inhibitor, in patients with gout: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study

Jae-Bum Jun et al. Arthritis Res Ther. .

Abstract

Background: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis. Current urate-lowering therapies have limitations, such as adverse drug reactions or limited efficacy. Epaminurad is a novel selective human urate transporter 1 (hURAT1) inhibitor that has been shown to reduce serum urate (sUA) levels in healthy volunteers and patients with gout. The aims of the current study were to evaluate the urate-lowering efficacy and safety of epaminurad compared with placebo in patients with gout, and to determine the optimal dose.

Methods: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding phase 2b clinical trial, which incorporated a standard-treatment reference arm, enrolled patients aged 19-70 years with gout and sUA level ≥ 0.42 mmol/L. Participants received gout prophylaxis and followed therapeutic lifestyle changes, and were randomized to receive epaminurad 3 mg, 6 mg or 9 mg, or febuxostat 80 mg, or matching placebo, once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with sUA level < 0.36 mmol/L at week 4 after initiation of study treatment. Statistical comparisons were performed between the epaminurad and placebo groups.

Results: Overall, 169 patients received study medication (99.40% male, mean ± SD age 48.26 ± 13.15 years, sUA level 0.53 ± 0.09 mmol/L). Mean adherence to treatment was > 90% in all groups. The proportion of patients with sUA < 0.36 mmol/L at week 4 was significantly higher in each epaminurad group (9 mg, 88.89%; 6 mg, 71.79%; 3 mg, 54.05%) compared with placebo (0.00%) (all p < 0.0001). The response rate in the febuxostat group was 84.21%. The proportion of patients who achieved sUA < 0.30 mmol/L, and mean percent and absolute change in sUA, were also significantly greater in all epaminurad groups versus placebo at week 4. Outcomes were consistent at weeks 8 and 12. The adverse event rate did not differ between epaminurad groups and placebo, and most events were mild. There were no significant differences in mean serum creatinine levels or liver function parameters between the epaminurad groups and placebo.

Conclusions: Epaminurad was effective at reducing sUA levels in patients with gout. The study also confirmed the safety and tolerability profile during 12 weeks of treatment.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04804111 (registered on 15 November 2020).

Keywords: Epaminurad; Gout; Human urate transport 1; Hyperuricemia; URC102; hURAT1 inhibitor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Approval was obtained from the relevant Institutional Review Board for each of the 18 participating centers. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Response rate: proportion of patients with serum urate level < 0.36 mmol/L (primary endpoint) or < 0.30 mmol/L at week 4

References

    1. Singh JA, Gaffo A. Gout epidemiology and comorbidities. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50:S11–6. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins C, Hwang JH, Kopp JB, Winkler CA, Cho SK. Review of urate-lowering therapeutics: from the past to the future. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:925219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abhishek A, Roddy E, Doherty M. Gout - a guide for the general and acute physicians. Clin Med (Lond). 2017;17:54–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandratre P, Mallen C, Richardson J, Muller S, Hider S, Rome K, et al. Health-related quality of life in gout in primary care: baseline findings from a cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48:61–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, et al. 2020 American college of rheumatology guideline for the management of gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72:744–60. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data