Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 22:19:1693-1697.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S520815. eCollection 2025.

Impact of Best Corrected Final Visual Acuity on the Performance of Intraocular Lens Power Calculations

H John Shammas  1   2 , Maya C Shammas  2 , Cooper Bahr  3 , Ramie Sahota  2 , Brad Hall  4
Affiliations

Impact of Best Corrected Final Visual Acuity on the Performance of Intraocular Lens Power Calculations

H John Shammas et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the best-corrected final visual acuity (BCFVA) on the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations.

Design setting and methods: This is a retrospective observational study in a private practice setting, Lynwood, California, USA. We analyzed 1107 eyes undergoing standard monofocal cataract surgery, with IOL power calculated using the Barrett Universal II formula. We evaluated the Mean Prediction Error (MPE) and its standard deviation (SD), the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and its SD and the percentage of eyes within ±0.50D and ±1.00D in relation to BCFVA.

Results: We analyzed 4 groups with BCFVA noted in LogMAR of ≤0.00, 0.02-0.10, 0.12-0.20 and 0.22-0.30. MPE was -0.030±0.321, -0.018±0.353, 0.015±0.369 and 0.070±0.421 D, respectively. MAE was 0.263±0.186, 0.282±0.213, 0.301±0.214 and 0.354±0.236 D, respectively. The percentage of eyes within ±0.50D was 85.9%, 82.6%, 81.5% and 75.5%, respectively. A subgroup analysis of the 1005 eyes with BCFVA of 0.20 LogMAR or better resulted in an MPE of -0.007±0.354 D, a MAE of 0.285±0.209 D and a percentage of eyes within ±0.50D of 82.8%. The difference between this subgroup and the group of eyes with a BCFVA 0.22-0.30 was statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Better IOL power predictions were noted by limiting the study to eyes with BCFVA of 0.20 LogMAR or better.

Keywords: Barrett Universal II formula; intraocular lens power calculations; post-operative visual acuity.

Plain language summary

During cataract surgery, the clouded natural lens of the eye is removed and replaced with an intraocular lens, or IOL. Prior to surgery, calculations are required to determine the power of the IOL to be inserted in the eye at the time of surgery. Many studies evaluate the accuracy of such calculations by comparing the final refraction to the predicted one. Most of these patients are seniors and some of them present with concomitant retinal problems that limit the final visual acuity. Studies usually evaluate eyes that have achieved a vision of 0.30 LogMAR (20/40) or better. Our results showed that limiting the analysis to only those eyes that have achieved 0.20 LogMAR (20/32) or better will result in a more accurate evaluation of these predictions by eliminating those cases with poorer final vision that are prone to a higher variability in the post-operative refraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

HJS and MCS are consultants to Alcon, Inc. CB, RS and BH report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

    1. Hoffer KJ, Aramberri J, Haigis W, et al. Protocols for studies of intraocular lens formula accuracy. Amer J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:403–405. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffer KJ, Savini G. Update on intraocular lens power calculation study protocols. The better way to design and report clinical trials. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:e115–e120. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang LW, Koch DD, Hill W, Abulafia A. Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: III. Criteria for analyzing outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:999–1002. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1490–1500. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darcy K, Gunn D, Tavassoli S, Kane JX, Kane JX. Assessment of the accuracy of new and updated intraocular lens power calculation formulas in 10930 eyes from the UK national health service. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:2–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.014 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources