Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 20;21(3):255-264.
doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2025.2025-2-14. Epub 2025 May 27.

Bayesian Model Prediction for Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations

Bayesian Model Prediction for Breast Cancer Survival: A Retrospective Analysis

Islam Bani Mohammad et al. Eur J Breast Health. .

Abstract

Objective: Over the recent years, machine learning (ML) models have been increasingly used in predicting breast cancer survival because of improvements in ML algorithms. However, cancer researchers still face a significant challenge in accurately predicting breast cancer patients' survival rates. The purpose was to predict breast cancer survival using a Bayesian network.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 2,995 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and subsequently hospitalized between January 1, 2012, and December 30, 2024. SPSS Modeler version 18.0 was used to build prediction models. The data were randomly split into a training set (2,097 cases, 70%) and a test set (898 cases, 30%) for developing the Bayesian network model and predicting the overall survival of patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The model included demographic variables (age, marital status, and governorate), laboratory/clinical variables (hemoglobin level, white blood cell count, presence of hypertension, and diabetes mellitus) and the outcome variable, patient survival status (binary value: survived/died). The discriminative ability of models was evaluated by accuracy and the area under the curve (AUC) in terms of superior predictive performance for breast cancer outcomes.

Results: The Bayesian model exhibited the best discriminatory performance among the nine models, with an AUC of 0.859 and the highest accuracy of 96.661%. In the context of feature importance, white blood cell value at the time of diagnosis was the most important feature for predicting the survival of breast cancer. Patients who had below-normal hemoglobin and above-normal white blood count values had a higher death probability than patients who had normal white blood count and hemoglobin values. The presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in patients with breast cancer led to a reduced survival probability.

Conclusion: The Bayesian model outperformed the other models in predicting the survival probability of breast cancer. Routine laboratory testing and demographic data can be included in a ML model to predict breast cancer survival. Accurate prediction of breast cancer survival is vital for clinical decision-making.

Keywords: Bayesian model; breast cancer; machine learning; prediction models; survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow chart
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier survival plots and Hazard ratios
Figure 3
Figure 3
The structure of Bayesian network model
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predictors’ importance for the outcome of breast cancer

Similar articles

References

    1. Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, Mafra A, Singh D, Laversanne M, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: global statistics for 2020 and 2040. Breast. 2022;66:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chhikara BS, Parang K. Global cancer statistics 2022: the trends projection analysis. Chem Biol Lett. 2023;10:451.
    1. Kumari D, Naidu MVSS, Panda S, Christopher J. Predicting breast cancer recurrence using deep learning. Discover Applied Sciences. 2025;7(2):113. doi: 10.1007/s42452-025-06512-5. - DOI
    1. Delen D, Walker G, Kadam A. Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif Intell Med. 2005;34(2):113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.07.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li J, Zhou Z, Dong J, Fu Y, Li Y, Luan Z, et al. Predicting breast cancer 5-year survival using machine learning: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0250370. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250370. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources