Technical Innovations and Complex Cases in Robotic Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review
- PMID: 40422503
- PMCID: PMC12110159
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32050244
Technical Innovations and Complex Cases in Robotic Surgery for Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review
Abstract
For over two decades, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has revolutionized thoracic oncology. With enhanced visualization, dexterity, and precision, RATS has reduced blood loss, shortened hospital stays, and sped up recovery compared to traditional surgery or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The use of 3D high-definition imaging and articulated instruments allows for complex resections and advanced lymph node assessment. RATS delivers oncological outcomes similar to open surgery and VATS, with high rates of complete (R0) resections and acceptable complication rates. Its minimally invasive nature promotes quicker recovery. Advances in imaging software and augmented reality further enhance surgical accuracy and reduce intraoperative risks. However, RATS has some limitations, including high costs and a lack of tactile feedback, and certain complex procedures, such as extended resections and intrapericardial interventions, remain challenging. With growing experience and technological advances, RATS shows promise in reducing morbidity, improving quality of life, and expanding access to advanced oncologic care. This article reviews the evolution, benefits, and limitations of RATS in NSCLC treatment, highlighting its emerging role in managing complex cases.
Keywords: RATS; mini-invasive surgery; non-small cell lung cancer; robotic surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Nelson D.B., Mehran R.J., Mitchell K.G., Rajaram R., Correa A.M., Bassett R.L., Jr., Antonoff M.B., Hofstetter W.L., Roth J.A., Sepesi B., et al. Robotic assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung Cancer: A comprehensive institutional experience. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019;108:370–376. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.051. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yang H.X., Woo K.M., Sima C.S., Bains M.S., Adusumilli P.S., Huang J., Finley D.J., Rizk N.P., Rusch V.W., Jones D.R., et al. Long-term Survival Based on the Surgical Approach to Lobectomy for Clinical Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison of Robotic, Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery, and Thoracotomy Lobectomy. Ann. Surg. 2017;265:431–437. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001708. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Catelli C., Corzani R., Zanfrini E., Franchi F., Ghisalberti M., Ligabue T., Meniconi F., Monaci N., Galgano A., Mathieu F., et al. RoboticAssisted (RATS) versus Video-Assisted (VATS) lobectomy: A monocentric prospective randomized trial. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2023;49:107256. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107256. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
