Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 25;13(5):338.
doi: 10.3390/toxics13050338.

Nanosilver Environmental Safety in Marine Organisms: Ecotoxicological Assessment of a Commercial Nano-Enabled Product vs an Eco-Design Formulation

Affiliations

Nanosilver Environmental Safety in Marine Organisms: Ecotoxicological Assessment of a Commercial Nano-Enabled Product vs an Eco-Design Formulation

Arianna Bellingeri et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

With the increasing use of manufactured nanomaterials in consumer products, especially silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), concerns about their environmental impact are rising. Two AgNP formulations were tested, the commercial nanosilver product nanArgen™ and a newly eco-designed bifunctionalized nanosilver (AgNPcitLcys), using marine organisms across three trophic levels, microalgae, microcrustaceans, and bivalves. Acute toxicity was assessed on the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum, brine shrimp larvae Artemia franciscana, and bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis. The behavior of the formulations in marine media, including stability across a concentration range (0.001-100 mg/L), was also evaluated. Results showed that nanArgen™ was less stable compared to AgNpcitLcys, releasing more silver ions and exhibiting higher toxicity to microalgae (100% growth inhibition at 1 mg/L) and microcrustaceans (>80% mortality at 10 mg/L). Conversely, AgNPcitLcys (10 µg/L) was more toxic to bivalves, possibly due to the smaller nanoparticle size affecting lysosomal membrane stability. This study highlights how eco-design, such as surface coating, influences AgNP behavior and toxicity. These findings emphasize the importance of eco-design in minimizing environmental impacts and guiding the development of safer, more sustainable nanomaterials.

Keywords: capping; eco-design; ecotoxicology; nano-enabled products; silver nanoparticles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ag concentration (µg/L) in (A) F/2 and (B) NSW upon incubation of AgNPcitLcys and nanArgen™ at, respectively, 0, 1, 5, 10, 100, 500, and 1000 µg/L and 0, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 mg/L of AgNPs. Results for 1 h of incubation (T1), 72 h of incubation for F/2, and 48 h of incubation for NSW (T2). Data shown as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) 72 h growth inhibition test of AgNPcitLcys (yellow), nanArgen™ (blue), and AgNO3 (gray) at 0, 1, 5, 10, 100, and 1000 µg/L with P. tricornutum; (B) 48 h mortality test of AgNPcitLcys (yellow), nanArgen™, (blue) and AgNO3 (gray) at 0, 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 mg/L with A. franciscana. Data shown as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A. franciscana specimens after 48 h of exposure to (A) CTRL, (B) 100 mg/L of AgNO3, (C) 100 mg/L of AgNPcitLcys, and (D) 100 mg/L of nanArgen™.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) NRRT expressed as % of destabilized cells of mussels exposed to 100 µg/L of AgNPcitLcys, nanArgen™, and AgNO3. Values are expressed as means ± SD out of 100 hemocytes scored. Asterisks above the bars show significant differences with control groups at each time point (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). (B) P-gp efflux activity in gills of mussels exposed to 100 µg/L of AgNPcitLcys, nanArgen™, and AgNO3. Verapamil (VER, 1 µM) is shown as the positive control. Data shown as fold variation in RhB content compared to controls. Asterisks on the above the bars show significant differences with the respective control groups (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).

References

    1. Giese B., Klaessig F., Park B., Kaegi R., Steinfeldt M., Wigger H., von Gleich A., Gottschalk F. Risks, release and concentrations of engineered nanomaterial in the environment. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1565. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19275-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang Y., Keller A.A., Cervantes-Avilés P., Nelson J. Fast multielement quantification of nanoparticles in wastewater and sludge using single-particle ICP-MS. ACS ES&T Water. 2020;1:205–213.
    1. Azimzada A., Jreije I., Hadioui M., Shaw P., Farner J.M., Wilkinson K.J. Quantification and characterization of Ti-, Ce-, and Ag-nanoparticles in global surface waters and precipitation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55:9836–9844. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00488. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cervantes-Avilés P., Keller A.A. Incidence of metal-based nanoparticles in the conventional wastewater treatment process. Water Res. 2021;189:116603. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116603. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ale A., Andrade V.S., Gutierrez M.F., Ayech A., Monserrat J.M., Desimone M.F., Cazenave J. Metal-based nanomaterials in aquatic environments: What do we know so far about their ecotoxicity? Aquat. Toxicol. 2024;275:107069. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107069. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources