Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 19;13(5):410.
doi: 10.3390/toxics13050410.

Subcellular Partitioning of Trace Elements Is Related to Metal Ecotoxicological Classes in Livers of Fish (Esox lucius; Coregonus clupeaformis) from the Yellowknife Area (Northwest Territories, Canada)

Aymeric Rolland  1 , Mike Palmer  2 , John Chételat  3 , Marc Amyot  4 , Maikel Rosabal  1
Affiliations

Subcellular Partitioning of Trace Elements Is Related to Metal Ecotoxicological Classes in Livers of Fish (Esox lucius; Coregonus clupeaformis) from the Yellowknife Area (Northwest Territories, Canada)

Aymeric Rolland et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

The subcellular partitioning of trace elements (TEs) may depend on their binding preferences, although few field data are available from mining-impacted areas. Northern pike and lake whitefish were collected from different aquatic systems located in the Yellowknife mining area (Northwest Territories, Canada) to examine the subcellular partitioning of TEs in liver cells. Elements belonging to metal classes based on binding affinities were considered: A (Ce, La), borderline (As, Pb), and class B (Ag, Cd). Measurements in the metal-detoxified fractions (granule-like structures and heat-stable proteins and peptides) and in the putative metal-sensitive fractions (heat-denatured proteins, mitochondria and microsomes, and lysosomes) revealed marked differences among metal classes. In both fish species, Cd and Ag accumulated more as detoxified forms (higher than 50%, likely bound to metallothionein-like proteins) than La and Ce (not more than 20%). The two borderline TEs (As and Pb) showed an intermediate behavior between classes A and B. Similar proportions were found in the "sensitive" subcellular fractions for all TEs, where quantitative ion character-activity relationships (QICARs) indicated the covalent index and electronegativity as predictors of the TE contribution in this compartment. This study supports the use of classes of metals to predict the toxicological risk of data-poor metals in mining areas.

Keywords: detoxification; fish; metal-binding properties; metal-handling strategies; quantitative ion character-activity relationships; toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and whisker distribution of the contribution (%, n = 10–28) of Ag (upper panels) and Cd (lower panels) in each subcellular fraction and compartment of the liver of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and northern pike (Esox lucius). Each dot represents an individual fish value. Bars with different letters indicate that the differences are significant (lowercase letters for subcellular fractions: Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test using Bonferroni correction; capitalized letters for compartments: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05). MIT: mitochondria; ML: microsomes and lysosomes; HDP: heat-denatured proteins; GRAN: granules; HSP: heat-stable proteins and peptides; MSC: metal-sensitive compartment; MDC: metal-detoxified compartment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box and whisker distribution of the contribution (%, n = 19–29) of As (upper panels) and Pb (lower panels) in each subcellular fraction and compartment of the liver of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and northern pike (Esox lucius). Each dot represents an individual fish value. Bars with different letters indicate that the differences are significant (lowercase letters for subcellular fractions: Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test using Bonferroni correction; capitalized letters for compartments: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05). MIT: mitochondria; ML: microsomes and lysosomes; HDP: heat-denatured proteins; GRAN: granules; HSP: heat-stable proteins and peptides; MSC: metal-sensitive compartment; MDC: metal-detoxified compartment.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Box and whisker distribution of the contribution (%; n = 16–26) of La (upper panels) and Ce (lower panels) in each subcellular fraction and compartment of the liver of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and northern pike (Esox lucius). Each dot represents an individual fish value. Bars with different letters indicate that the differences are significant (lowercase letters for subcellular fractions: Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test using Bonferroni correction; capitalized letters for compartments: Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05). MIT: mitochondria; ML: microsomes and lysosomes; HDP: heat-denatured proteins; GRAN: granules; HSP: heat-stable proteins and peptides; MSC: metal-sensitive compartment; MDC: metal-detoxified compartment.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Box and whisker distribution of total concentrations (means ± SD, nmol g-1 dw) of Ag, Cd, As, Pb, La, and Ce in the liver of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis; n = 6–10) and northern pike (Esox lucius; n = 5–8) collected from the Yellowknife area. Each dot represents an individual fish value. Bars with different letters indicate that the differences are significant (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test using Bonferroni correction, p < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Box and whisker distribution of the metal contribution (%; n = 11–29) of metals belonging to different classes (Class B, Borderline, A) in the metal-detoxified compartment and in the metal-sensitive compartment of the liver of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and northern pike (Esox lucius). Each dot represents individual fish value. Bars with different letters indicate that the differences are significant (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test using Bonferroni correction, p < 0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Le Faucheur S., Mertens J., Van Genderen E., Boullemant A., Fortin C., Campbell P.G.C. Development of Quantitative Ion Character–Activity Relationship Models to Address the Lack of Toxicological Data for Technology-Critical Elements. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2021;40:1139–1148. doi: 10.1002/etc.4960. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolterbeek H.T., Verburg T.G. Predicting metal toxicity revisited: General properties vs. specific effects. Sci. Total Environ. 2001;279:87–115. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00756-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kinraide T.B. Improved scales for metal ion softness and toxicity. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009;28:525–533. doi: 10.1897/08-208.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nieboer E., Richardson D.H.S. The replacement of the nondescript term ‘heavy metals’ by a biologically and chemically significant classification of metal ions. Environ. Pollut. Ser. B Chem. Phys. 1980;1:3–26. doi: 10.1016/0143-148X(80)90017-8. - DOI
    1. Pearson R.G. Hard and Soft Acids and Bases. In: Arthur F.S., editor. Survey of Progress in Chemistry. Volume 5. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 1969. pp. 1–52.

LinkOut - more resources