Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul 1;185(7):767-776.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.1345.

Patient-Delivered Continuous Care for Weight Loss Maintenance: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient-Delivered Continuous Care for Weight Loss Maintenance: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Tricia M Leahey et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: Weight loss maintenance (WLM) is one of the most difficult challenges in obesity treatment. Continuous care, which involves frequent behavioral weight management sessions delivered by professional staff, shows promise; however, this care is costly and unsustainable. Thus, new, efficacious treatment models are needed for WLM.

Objective: To examine the efficacy of an entirely patient-delivered treatment for WLM compared with professionally delivered standard-of-care treatment (SOC).

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial used a 2-phase WLM design. During phase 1, participants received an online weight loss program. Those who achieved 5% or greater weight loss in phase 1 were eligible for phase 2, the actual 18-month WLM trial. Participants in the maintenance trial were randomized to either an entirely patient-delivered lifestyle intervention for WLM or SOC delivered by professional staff. Participants aged 18 to 75 years with a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 25 to 50 were recruited from a single academic research center. Data were collected from February 2018 to March 2023, and data were analyzed from September 2024 to February 2025.

Interventions: Patient-to-patient treatment involved no professional staff; instead, mentors (successful weight losers) delivered intervention sessions and peers (fellow participants) provided ongoing, remotely delivered evidence-based social support. SOC was current best practice for WLM-group lifestyle intervention led by professionals. Both WLM interventions were 18 months in duration.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was weight change during the 18-month trial. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity, and sedentary behavior.

Results: Among the 287 randomized participants (240 [83.6%] female; mean [SD] age, 53.6 [0.9] years), 268 (93.4%) completed the trial. There was a statistically significant difference in weight change by arm; patient-to-patient treatment yielded significantly less weight regain than SOC (month 6: -1.44 kg [95% CI, -2.35 to 0.54] vs -0.16 [95% CI, -1.13 to 0.82]; month 12: 0.04 kg [95% CI, -0.86 to 0.95] vs 0.77 [95% CI, -0.21 to 1.47]; month 18: 0.77 kg [95% CI, -0.14 to 1.68] vs 2.37 [95% CI, 1.40 to 3.34]; P = .002). Parallel findings were observed for diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, physical activity, and sedentary behavior.

Conclusions and relevance: In this trial, patient-delivered lifestyle intervention (mentor interventionists plus peer support) yielded significantly better WLM and cardiovascular risk outcomes compared with SOC delivered by professionals. Future research may examine the effectiveness of this novel treatment approach in community and clinical settings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03396653.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Leahey reported grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study. Dr Denmat reported grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study. Dr Wyckoff reported grants from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases during the conduct of the study. Dr Unick reported personal fees from Medifast Scientific outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment on

References

    1. Pi-Sunyer X, Blackburn G, Brancati FL, et al. ; Look AHEAD Research Group . Reduction in weight and cardiovascular disease risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes: one-year results of the look AHEAD trial. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(6):1374-1383. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeffery RW, Drewnowski A, Epstein LH, et al. Long-term maintenance of weight loss: current status. Health Psychol. 2000;19(1S):5-16. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.Suppl1.5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wing RR, Bolin P, Brancati FL, et al. ; Look AHEAD Research Group . Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(2):145-154. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacLean PS, Wing RR, Davidson T, et al. NIH working group report: innovative research to improve maintenance of weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(1):7-15. doi: 10.1002/oby.20967 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perri MG, Sears SF Jr, Clark JE. Strategies for improving maintenance of weight loss. toward a continuous care model of obesity management. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(1):200-209. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.1.200 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data