Evaluating cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors: The role of echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the Munich Cardio-Oncology-Exercise retrospective Registry
- PMID: 40425074
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133421
Evaluating cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors: The role of echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the Munich Cardio-Oncology-Exercise retrospective Registry
Erratum in
-
Corrigendum to "Evaluating cardiovascular risk factors in breast cancer survivors: The role of echocardiography and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the Munich Cardio-Oncology-Exercise retrospective Registry" [International Journal of Cardiology, Volume 436, 133421 October 01, 2025].Int J Cardiol. 2025 Nov 1;438:133472. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133472. Epub 2025 Jul 15. Int J Cardiol. 2025. PMID: 40670257 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer survivors (BCS) have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVDRF). However, the role of cardiopulmonary fitness, echocardiography and treatment regimen e.g. anthracycline, HER2-targeted therapy (AC/H) or endocrine therapy (ET) are uncertain.
Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included BCS without visceral metastases, who had been treated with either AC/H or ET and assessed by echocardiography, cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and the H2FPEF score at baseline. We included BCS with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50 % and absence of CVDRF at baseline. The primary outcome was the incidence of CVDRF.
Results: A total of 112 BCS were included (mean age of 54.6 ± 9.9 years, BC stage I-III). After a median follow-up of 21 months new-onset arterial hypertension was the most common CVDRF observed (n = 17). New onset hypertension was related to higher baseline resting systolic blood pressure (127.4 ± 9.2 mmHg vs. 117.3 ± 13.1 mmHg, p = 0.002) and H2FPEF scores (1.2 ± 0.8 vs. 0.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.043). Echocardiographic and CPET findings associated with new-onset arterial hypertension included greater left ventricular mass index (77.3 ± 24.2 g/m2 vs. 65.6 ± 15.5 g/m2, p = 0.007), higher peak systolic blood pressure (193.1 ± 19.5 mmHg vs. 173.3 ± 21.2 mmHg, p = 0.017) and ventilatory power (6.4 ± 1.3 mmHg vs. 5.7 ± 1.2 mmHg, p = 0.022). Treatment regimen had no influence on the development of CVDRF.
Conclusions: The most common CVDRF among BCS is hypertension, underscoring the importance of monitoring this outcome irrespective of breast cancer treatment regimens. The H2FPEF score, CPET and echocardiography may help identify BCS at risk of developing hypertension. Strain and biomarkers were not available, impeding detection of cardiotoxicity.
Keywords: Anthracyclines; Breast cancer survivors; Cardiovascular risk factors; Exercise; HER2-targeted therapy.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Simon Wernhart has received honoraria for lectures from Bristol-Myers Squibb. Stephan Mueller has received personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb (consulting services). Mark Haykowsky is funded, in part, by a Research Chair in Aging in the Faculty of Nursing, College of Healthy Sciences at UofA. Martin Halle reports honoraria for lectures beyond this cancer topic from Abbott, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMW, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Medi, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, Norsan, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche, consulting fees from Medical Park. Sabine Grill has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo. No other potential conflicts of interest are reported.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
