Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28;15(1):18588.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03577-5.

Integrating human mobility and animal movement data reveals complex space-use between humans and white-tailed deer in urban environments

Affiliations

Integrating human mobility and animal movement data reveals complex space-use between humans and white-tailed deer in urban environments

Szandra A Péter et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Human expansion into wildlife habitats has increased the need to understand human-wildlife interactions, necessitating interdisciplinary approaches to assess zoonotic disease transmission risks and public health impacts. This study integrated fine-grained human foot traffic data with hourly GPS data from 38 white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), a species linked to SARS-CoV-2, brucella, and chronic wasting disease, in Howard County, Maryland. We explored spatial and temporal overlap between human and deer activity over 24 months (2018-2019) across a hexagonal tessellation with metrics like hourly popularity and visit counts. Negative binomial models were fitted to the visit counts of each deer and humans per tessellation area, using landscape features as predictors. A separate deer-only model included commercial human activity as another predictor. Spatial analysis showed deer and humans sharing spaces in the study area, with results indicating deer using more populated residential areas and areas with commercial activity. Temporal analysis showed deer avoiding commercial spaces during daytime but using them in late evening and early morning. These findings highlight the complex space use between species and the importance of integrating detailed human mobility and animal movement data when managing wildlife-human conflict and zoonotic disease transmission, particularly in urban areas with a high probability of deer-human interactions.

Keywords: Data integration; Human mobility; Human–wildlife interactions; Movement ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: The deer trapping protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC approval #16–024) of the United States Department of Agriculture Beltsville Agricultural Research Center. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study area in Howard County, Maryland, defined by a hexagonal tessellation (tan hexagons) within the 100% MCP of deer home ranges, showing commercial POIs (orange points), residential building footprints (brown polygons), and county parks (green polygons). Hexagons within each Howard County park were merged into single polygons. Map was created using ArcGIS Pro 3.3.2 (basemap source: County of Anne Arundel, VGIN, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USFWS, USDA, M-NCPPC, NOAA).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean visit counts of deer (blue) and humans (orange) in the hexagonal tessellation from January 2018 to December 2019, with hexagons within each Howard County park merged into larger park polygons (a–f). Monthly mean visit counts of deer (a) and humans (b). Winter mean visit counts of deer (c) and humans (d). Summer mean visit counts of deer (e) and humans (f). Maps were created using ArcGIS Pro 3.3.2 (basemap source: County of Anne Arundel, VGIN, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, FAO, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USFWS).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean popularity by hour of deer (blue line) and humans (orange line) in parks (a), areas with commercial activity (b), and areas without commercial activity (c) from January 2018 to December 2019. The values were smoothed using a 3-h rolling mean.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean popularity by hour of deer (blue line) and humans (orange line) during winter and summer in parks (a,b), areas with commercial activity (c,d), and areas without commercial activity (e,f) from January 2018 to December 2019. The values were smoothed using a 3-hour rolling mean.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Posterior distributions of estimated model coefficients from models predicting deer (blue) (a,b) and human (orange) (b) activity. Outlined distributions represent all values in the posterior distribution and colored areas represent the 95% credible intervals.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Visualization of the hexagonal tessellation showing POIs within a hexagon (a) and deer movement trajectories across the tessellation (b).

References

    1. Ellis-Soto, D. et al. A vision for incorporating human mobility in the study of human–wildlife interactions. Nat. Ecol. Evol.7, 1362–1372 (2023). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller, H. J., Dodge, S., Miller, J. & Bohrer, G. Towards an integrated science of movement: converging research on animal movement ecology and human mobility science. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.33, 855–876 (2019). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanderson, E. W. et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience52, 891 (2002). - DOI
    1. Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Theobald, D. M., Baruch-Mordo, S. & Kiesecker, J. Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob. Change Biol.25, 811–826 (2019). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watson, J. E. M. et al. Persistent disparities between recent rates of habitat conversion and protection and implications for future global conservation targets. Conserv. Lett.9, 413–421 (2016). - DOI

LinkOut - more resources