Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;642(8066):53-57.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09016-9. Epub 2025 May 28.

Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas

Affiliations

Observing anyonization of bosons in a quantum gas

Sudipta Dhar et al. Nature. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Anyons1,2 are low-dimensional quasiparticles that obey fractional statistics, hence interpolating between bosons and fermions. In two dimensions, they exist as elementary excitations of fractional quantum Hall states3-5 and are believed to enable topological quantum computing6,7. One-dimensional anyons have been theoretically proposed, but their experimental realization has proven to be difficult. Here we observed emergent anyonic correlations in a one-dimensional strongly interacting quantum gas, resulting from the phenomenon of spin-charge separation8-10. A mobile impurity provides the necessary spin degree of freedom to engineer anyonic correlations in the charge sector and simultaneously acts as a probe to reveal these correlations. Starting with bosons, we tune the statistical phase to transmute bosons through anyons to fermions and observe an asymmetric momentum distribution11-14, a hallmark of anyonic correlations. Going beyond equilibrium conditions, we observed dynamical fermionization of the anyons15. This study opens the door to the exploration of non-equilibrium anyonic phenomena in a highly controllable setting15-17.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Experimental realization of 1D anyons.
a, Emergence of anyons from spin–charge separation. For strong interactions in one dimension, the wavefunction factorizes into a charge part and a spin part. Note that, although the illustration depicts a localized spin impurity, we created a delocalized impurity. The charge sector (left) depicts one possible positional arrangement of the particles, whereas the spin sector (right) is one possible spin distribution in the squeezed space, both corresponding to the arrangement of the spinful particles in the top line. In the finite momentum ground state of the system, all the momentum is carried by the spin sector in the form of spin waves. Integrating out the spin degrees of freedom realizes an effective system of 1D hardcore anyons in the charge sector. The statistical phase θ of these emerging anyons is given by the momentum of the spin waves (see ‘Exchange symmetry engineering’ and ‘Emergence of anyons via spin–charge separation’ in Methods). b, Edge of the excitation spectrum of a 1D Bose gas for charge excitation (dashed line) and spin excitation (solid line). c, Expected momentum distributions of anyons for different values of the statistical phase θ as set by the momentum ħQ and indicated in b. d, Experimental realization of an ensemble of 1D Bose gases in tubes formed by two retro-reflected laser beams. On average, each tube contained one impurity particle (blue sphere). The interaction between the impurity and the Tonks–Girardeau host gas (red spheres) can be tuned by means of a Feshbach resonance. e, Host–host (dashed curve) and host–impurity (solid curve) scattering lengths a↑↑ and a↑↓ as a function of the magnetic field B.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Momentum distribution of anyonized bosons.
a, Evolution of the measured impurity momentum distribution n(k) for variable statistical phases θ determined by the injected momentum ħQ, as indicated. Each distribution is the average of seven experimental realizations. b, Numerical results of the anyonic momentum distribution na(k) using AHM. cf, Example distributions for θ/π equal to 0 (c), 0.53(2) (d), 0.72(3) (e) and 0.98(4) (f). The error bars are smaller than the symbol sizes. The data were compared to the numerical results of the ground states of AHM (dotted lines), swap model (solid lines) and time evolution governed by the sBHM (dashed lines).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Characterization of the anyonic momentum distribution.
a, Measured peak momentum k*. b, Peak occupation of the impurity momentum distribution n(k) as a function of statistical phase θ. The experimental data (dots) were compared with the results of the simulations on the basis of various models, as indicated. The error bars reflect the standard error.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Dynamical fermionization of hardcore anyons.
ac, Evolution of the impurity momentum distribution n(k) after quenching the confinement to a flat-bottom trap and allowing 1D expansion for t1D = 0 ms (a), 2 ms (b) and 5 ms (c) for three different values of statistical phase θ, as indicated. Each distribution is the average of ten experimental realizations. df, Theoretical prediction for the evolution of the momentum distribution of hardcore anyons (N = 10) during 1D free expansion for t1D = 0 ms (d), 2 ms (e) and 5 ms (f).
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Role of finite force and finite interaction.
a Measured n(k) at fixed total momentum Q and fixed interaction strength γ for two different values of the force F as indicated. Each distribution is the average of 7 experimental realizations. The experimental data is compared to the results of the simulations based on the sBHM. b Measured n(k) at fixed Q for different γ. The solid line is the prediction from AHM.

Similar articles

References

    1. Leinaas, J. M. & Myrheim, J. On the theory of identical particles. Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971–1996)37, 1–23 (1977).
    1. Wilczek, F. Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin particles. Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 957–959 (1982).
    1. Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L. & Gossard, A. C. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559–1562 (1982).
    1. Laughlin, R. B. Anomalous quantum Hall effect: an incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations. Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395–1398 (1983).
    1. Arovas, D., Schrieffer, J. R. & Wilczek, F. Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 722–723 (1984).

LinkOut - more resources