Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 28;41(1):147.
doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06053-3.

Can we do less? A review of imaging practices for evaluating cervical spine injuries in pediatric blunt trauma patients

Affiliations

Can we do less? A review of imaging practices for evaluating cervical spine injuries in pediatric blunt trauma patients

Humza Thobani et al. Pediatr Surg Int. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether a validated clinical decision tool or other clinical features at presentation could predict cervical spine injury in a cohort of children who were selected for cervical spine imaging following blunt trauma.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients < 18 years presenting to our institution with blunt trauma who underwent cervical spine imaging over a 3-year period. Relevant data on patients' clinical presentation, imaging, management and outcomes were compiled. The NEXUS screening tool was retroactively applied to all patients. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of CSI.

Results: 1,321 patients presented with blunt trauma, out of which 484 underwent cervical spine imaging and were included in our study. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were conducted in most patients (n = 447, 92.4%). NEXUS risk stratification failed to identify 9 CSIs and had an overall sensitivity of 80.4%. Out of all the possible risk factors we investigated, only chest/torso trauma was found to be significantly associated with CSI on multivariate regression.

Conclusion: We were unable to identify a screening tool or predictive model which could be used to further reduce imaging practices at our institution without missing clinically significant CSIs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no financial or non-financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD, Shah MN, Mower WR, Hoffman JR (2001) A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics 108(2):e20 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rana AR, Drongowski R, Breckner G, Ehrlich PF (2009) Traumatic cervical spine injuries: characteristics of missed injuries. J Pediatr Surg 44(1):151–155 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polk-Williams A, Carr BG, Blinman TA, Masiakos PT, Wiebe DJ, Nance ML (2008) Cervical spine injury in young children: a National Trauma Data Bank review. J Pediatr Surg 43(9):1718–1721 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kokoska ER, Keller MS, Rallo MC, Weber TR (2001) Characteristics of pediatric cervical spine injuries. J Pediatr Surg 36(1):100–105 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shin JI, Lee NJ, Cho SK (2016) Pediatric cervical spine and spinal cord injury: A national database study. Spine 41(4):283–292 - DOI - PubMed