Optimizing Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Donor Sites: A Comparative Study of Ulnar-Based Flap and Split-Thickness Skin Grafting
- PMID: 40426958
- PMCID: PMC12108682
- DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13051131
Optimizing Wound Healing in Radial Forearm Donor Sites: A Comparative Study of Ulnar-Based Flap and Split-Thickness Skin Grafting
Abstract
Background: The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is a common technique in head and neck reconstructive surgery. This study aimed to compare the clinical and biochemical outcomes of wound healing following ulnar-based transposition flap (UBTF) versus split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) for donor site closure, with a particular emphasis on tissue regeneration. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 patients (6 women, 18 men), underwent RFFF reconstruction. The donor site was closed using the UBTF technique in 10 cases, while STSG was performed in 14 cases. Postoperative complications-including necrosis, edema, hematoma, infection, and wound dehiscence-along with healing times were assessed daily during the first seven postoperative days and at monthly follow-ups over six months. Pre- and postoperative biochemical analyses included hemoglobin (HB), white blood cell count (WBC), platelets (PLT), albumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. An aesthetic evaluation of the flap was also performed. Results: The two groups were homogeneous. Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in the STSG group, which also demonstrated significantly longer healing times (p = 0.0004). In contrast, the UBTF group showed significantly better aesthetic outcomes in terms of skin color (p = 0.000021), skin texture (p = 0.000018), and flap stability (p = 0.0398). Additionally, pre- and postoperative PLT counts were significantly higher in the UBTF group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.043, respectively). Conclusions: While STSG remains a well-established method for forearm donor site closure following RFFF harvest, this study demonstrates that UBTF is a viable alternative associated with better clinical and aesthetic outcomes.
Keywords: radial forearm free flap (RFFF); split-thickness skin graft (STSG); tissue regeneration; ulnar-based transposition flap (UBTF); wound healing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest related to this work. Dr. Magdalena Misiak-Gałązka is affiliated with both the Evimed Medical Center and the Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology; however, this dual affiliation has not influenced the content or outcomes of the study.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Radial forearm free flap donor site morbidity: ulnar-based transposition flap vs split-thickness skin graft.Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jan;138(1):38-43. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.216. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012. PMID: 22249627
-
Full-thickness skin graft versus split-thickness skin graft for radial forearm free flap donor site closure: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 26;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02471-x. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38409059 Free PMC article.
-
The radial forearm snake flap: An underutilized technique for fasciocutaneous and osteocutaneous forearm flaps with primary closure.Head Neck. 2022 May;44(5):1106-1113. doi: 10.1002/hed.27004. Epub 2022 Feb 14. Head Neck. 2022. PMID: 35165977
-
Is there an ideal way to close the donor site of radial forearm free flaps?Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;56(6):444-452. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 30. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018. PMID: 29859780 Review.
-
Full-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Split-Thickness Skin Graft for Radial Forearm Free Flap Transfer in Oral Cavity Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2023 Nov 23;15(11):e49279. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49279. eCollection 2023 Nov. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38143661 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Markiewicz-Gospodarek A., Kozioł M., Tobiasz M., Baj J., Radzikowska-Büchner E., Przekora A. Burn Wound Healing: Clinical Complications, Medical Care, Treatment, and Dressing Types: The Current State of Knowledge for Clinical Practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:1338. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031338. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dutra Alves N.S., Reigado G.R., Santos M., Caldeira I.D.S., Hernandes H.D.S., Freitas-Marchi B.L., Zhivov E., Chambergo F.S., Nunes V.A. Advances in regenerative medicine-based approaches for skin regeneration and rejuvenation. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2025;13:1527854. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1527854. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kumar R., Kumar V., Mohan A., Gupta G., Kashyap V. Translational research in the generation of therapeutic medicine for wound healing: A review. Discov. Med. 2024;1:158. doi: 10.1007/s44337-024-00142-3. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous