Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 23;15(5):611.
doi: 10.3390/biom15050611.

New Lead Schiff Bases Predominantly Mediate Vasorelaxant Activity Through α1 Receptor Blocking Activity

Affiliations

New Lead Schiff Bases Predominantly Mediate Vasorelaxant Activity Through α1 Receptor Blocking Activity

Zakia Subhan et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Schiff bases synthesized in our laboratory have demonstrated pain-relieving effects through both peripheral and central nervous system pathways. Considering that centrally acting analgesics often affect the muscle tone of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and related deep internal organs, this study was conducted to examine potential relaxant effects on blood vessels and GIT smooth muscles. The possible relaxant effects of Schiff bases (SB1 and SB2) on isolated rabbit aortic strips were evaluated. The experiments involved assessing their impact on contractions induced by 80 mM potassium chloride (KCL) and 1 µM norepinephrine (NE). Norepinephrine concentration response curves (N. ECRCs) were constructed in the absence and presence of three different concentrations of SB1 and SB2, using N. ECRCs as a negative control. Terazosin served as a standard α1 receptor blocker. Docking studies were employed to validate the mechanism of action for SB1 and SB2. The study outcomes suggest that SB1 is more potent than SB2, demonstrating lower EC50 values for NE-induced contractions in intact (5.50 × 10-5 ± 2.23 M) and denuded (5.81 × 10-5 ± 3.80 M) aortae. For NE-induced contractions, SB1 showed percent relaxation values of 48% and 41% in intact and denuded aortae, respectively. In comparison, SB2 exhibited values of 82.5% and 74%, showing that SB1 is more efficacious than SB2. The rightward shift of N. ECRCs for both SB1 and SB2 confirms their inhibition of α1 receptors. Additive effects of SB1 and SB2 were seen in the presence of verapamil (p < 0.0001). Docking analysis revealed that the compounds can properly bind to the target receptor Gq 1D (P25100). Findings show that both Schiff base SB1 and SB2 produce significant (p < 0.05) vasorelaxation via the α1 receptor blocking mechanism.

Keywords: Schiff base; Swiss target prediction; alpha one antagonist; docking; vasodilator; verapamil.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Structural formula of SB1. (B) Structural formula of SB2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of Schiff base SB1 on intact and endothelium-removed aortic tissue samples. For Schiff base SB1: (A) influence on potassium-chloride-induced contractions in intact aortic segments; (B) influence on potassium-chloride-induced contractions in endothelium-removed aortic segments; (C) influence on norepinephrine-induced contractions in endothelium-intact aortic segments; (D) impact on contractions induced by norepinephrine in endothelium-removed aortic segments. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 3–4, p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of Schiff base SB2 on intact and endothelium-removed aortic tissue samples. For Schiff base SB2: (A) influence on potassium-chloride-induced contractions in intact aortic segments; (B) influence on potassium-chloride-induced contractions in endothelium-removed aortic segments; (C) influence on norepinephrine-induced contractions in intact aortic segments; (D) influence on norepinephrine-induced contractions in endothelium-removed aortic segments. Data presented as mean ± SD (n = 3–4, p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The impact of Schiff base SB1 (A) and SB2 (B) on norepinephrine-induced contractions in endothelium-removed aortic strips, with verapamil present, is examined. All data shown as mean ± SD (n = 3–4, p < 0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5
An analysis of how Schiff base SB1, Schiff base SB2, and Terazosin influence Norepinephrine Concentration Response Curves. (A) N. ECRCs with and without various concentrations of Schiff base SB1 in endothelium-removed aortae. (B) N. ECRCs with and without different concentrations of Schiff base SB2 in denuded aortae. (C) N. ECRCs with and without varying concentrations of Terazosin in endothelium-removed aortae. All data expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3–4).
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Represented docked complex of SB1 and target receptor. (B) Unveiling the binding cleft of receptor Gq 1D (P25100) and attached compounds (SB1). (C) Interactive amino acid residues and several types of bonding.
Figure 7
Figure 7
(A) Represented docked complex of SB2 and target receptor. (B) Unveil the binding cleft of receptor Gq 1D (P25100) and attached compounds (SB2). (C) Interactive amino acid residues and several types of bonding.

References

    1. Selvakumar P., Seenivasan S., Jadhav R., Deshmukh S.M., Elavarasi V. Generative AI Techniques for Sustainability in Healthcare Security. IGI Global Scientific Publishing; New York, NY, USA: 2025. Drug Discovery and Development Processes; pp. 195–212.
    1. Zhou S.-F., Zhong W.-Z. Drug design and discovery: Principles and applications. Molecules. 2017;22:279. doi: 10.3390/molecules22020279. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaur R.P. The Drug Development Process: From Discovery to Market. Int. J. Life Sci. 2024;13:118–134.
    1. Zhong W.-Z., Zhou S.-F. Molecular science for drug development and biomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:20072–20078. doi: 10.3390/ijms151120072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xiao X., Min J.-L., Lin W.-Z., Liu Z., Cheng X., Chou K.-C. iDrug-Target: Predicting the interactions between drug compounds and target proteins in cellular networking via benchmark dataset optimization approach. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2015;33:2221–2233. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2014.998710. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources